Hard to belive...
If the pilot had returned to LAX, British Airways would been stuck for around $200,000.
The airline has vociferously denied that the decision to press on with only 3/4 of its available engines had anything to do with financial considerations. However, BA policy has since been clarified that the plane must land if it experiences an engine failure, even if those engines remaining are running just fine.
...I bet this particular Captain's word was obeyed...and pretty quick........commoner
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/tm_ob ... _page.html
You know, I was thinking how strong those engines must be if he was flying with barely 3/4 of his engines.
After circling the Pacific for a few minutes while the captain contacted BA's control center, the crew decided to continue the 11-hour, 5,000 mile flight to Heathrow on three engines, rather than turn back and face a minimum five hour delay
...remember the last time your flight was delayed or cancelled...? Yeahhhh....
I did:I never had a delayed or cancelled flight.
I would rather be delayed or cancelled than have my life risked by a dimwit pilot or airline company trying to spare a dime
And those passengers who can't understand something like that are the ones that belong to families that will be the first in line at the lawsuit hearing trying to get money for your death.
So yes in a situation like that I would much rather be delayed or wait for another flight, I like to take risks but I am not a idiot. Unfortantly too many others are.
And too think that terrorism is the main thing people fear most when flying
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 452 guests