by Scottler » Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:42 pm
I agree with you, Hagar (go figure lol) but if it came down to the word of a police officer or a word of a convicted felon, I've gotta go with the cop. Thankfully, it's not often that the case solely lies on that evidence...if the evidence shows that the testimony of the criminal is more likely, I have no problem siding with the criminal. I'm just expressing my thoughts on this case as it was presented. The facts were put up as an inmate who died as a result of the taser. It says that he was shocked five times during the arrest and 4 times in the cell. Based on THOSE facts, I'm supporting the officers. The fact that this meathead was in jail tells me that he wasn't exactly the model citizen. The law of probability suggests that there's a high likelihood that the now deceased idiot was behaving inappropriately, and my sympathy is not on his side.
That said, it's also worth noting that the question (as with all public opinion polls) is worded in a very biased manner. "Who is at fault here, the inmate for resisting or the officers for tasing the individual so many times?"
An unbiased question would have been "Who, if anyone, is to blame?"
This isn't to slam Papa's post...it's just to point out that when you see questions like this, look at the wording before you answer...