PS. I have the feeling that this case is being used by various pressure groups on either side to promote their own interests. They can protest all they like but I doubt they have any real concern for the unfortunate woman they are callously using for their own benefit.
No easy answer to this & each case must be individually judged by the people who know best. That's the medical experts. However difficult it might be I would have to accept their advice on that. I only know what I've heard on brief news reports on the radio so I'm not qualified to comment on this particular case. I'm not in favour of keeping people alive artificially unless there's a good chance of recovery with some quality of life. This wouldn't have cropped up before the technology was available & she would have been allowed to pass away naturally. I'm quite certain that in the past people have been quietly assisted to die to prevent further suffering. You would shoot an animal in similar circumstances to put it out of its misery.
,i think for the very first time in modern times the society is facing with a very hard and old issue,
I can't understand people who just don't value life. Precious, precious life.
I can't understand people who just don't value life. Precious, precious life.
I know I'm wasting my time Ben but what is life all about if you can't enjoy or appreciate it? I can't imagine what it would be like to be completely helpless without being able to move, see, hear or communicate with anyone..
We seem to have opposing views on the subjects of both mercy killing & death sentences for criminals. I agree with mercy killing but not with the death sentence.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 396 guests