

Solid, I'm glad to hear your performance is increasing with every new driver NVIDIA releases. Can we please see your system specs?
I too am using this driver and would have to recommend it over the 169.09 and 169.13 betas, which caused severe stability issues on my pc. They also really screwed my FS, as something to do with "Video Shader Caching" (I think), was activated, and could not be turned off on my motherboard. The shader issue caused several modules to fail in FS9 and FSX, preventing a flight from even loading.
Basically, I too say try these drivers, and would recommend them highly. However, the betas may be just as good if not better for some.
Regards,
Celtman 8-)
Tried it last night and Kept it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.....I was getting a range of 18-36 fps with 169.09 which was nice....with this new driver I am receiving from my Rinky Dink PC with Nvidia 8800GTS, and 2 GIG.....25-40 and much more steady, FSX sliders mostly at 95% except air traffic at 45%, vehicle traffic 25% and Water at 1X ........................do try it and good luck.![]()
Solid, I'm glad to hear your performance is increasing with every new driver NVIDIA releases. Can we please see your system specs?
Tried it last night and Kept it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.....I was getting a range of 18-36 fps with 169.09 which was nice....with this new driver I am receiving from my Rinky Dink PC with Nvidia 8800GTS, and 2 GIG.....25-40 and much more steady, FSX sliders mostly at 95% except air traffic at 45%, vehicle traffic 25% and Water at 1X ........................do try it and good luck.![]()
Dont take this the wrong way
but your estimates of what you are getting always tend to push the limits of reality
going from 18-36 to 25-40 means your average performance increased 27/32.5 or 6.5 frames and assuming you are making that judgment based on the exact same flight, and the frames are being recorded at the exact same times (electronically) under the exact same conditions in the air, location, time of day, weather, number of clouds showing, etc, etc, etc
that would mean a single driver increased your perf by 24.07% Sorry, but that is just rediculous. Even Aces had to rewrite the title to get 20% out of it
Your estimates are far fetched. You must remember you can not report such thing accurately without using an engineering base line calculation and test pattern to make that assesment.
As I recall it was not just the beta's but you also had this happen after removing the drivers completely, and, installing the official release
As I recall it was not just the beta's but you also had this happen after removing the drivers completely, and, installing the official release
Sorry I mustn't have explained well. I had the problem with the betas, and with no drivers, but upon install of the newest drivers, my FS worked fine. I researched for hours on the net and found several people having the same problems with shader caching and FS, most of whom had the same motherboard as me, which does not allow you to disable this feature (as far as I am aware). Therefore, my motherboard caused the 169.09 and .13 betas to be unstable and work incorrectly. My system obviously just didn't function well with them
Regards,
Celtman
I think you are right Nick... :-?
Installed the most recent official drivers (163.75), motherboard drivers and checked I had the latest version of DirectX, same problem, with both FSX and FS9. Other games are running well though. Perhaps a coincidence. Unfortunately no system restore, turned it off as it is such a resource hog.
Return to Flight Simulator X (FSX) and Steam
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 754 guests