yah, u should see the Guru3D ones, they make the 2900 look like a DX9 card...
Better image quality and on par with a 8800GTS.
Same story over and over.
But its also bigger, and consumes more power. And if its any reoccuring theme with ATi it will run hot too, with a horrable stock cooler.
And not to mention that ATI has horrable OpenGL dirvers. But currently their Vista drivers are better.
The circle continues to carve.
Cheers
Cameron
ROFL
OK, finally someone figured it out...
http://www.computerbase.de/news/treiber ... vergleich/
Its in German but it tells the story. There is a driver bug, plain and simple. Depending on which version of driver was used the results will be skewed, and by quite a bit.
I am sure ATI is on it and will have it fixed quickly.
As you can see those show a far cry from what the review sites are posting and demonstrates the driver revision compared to the results. It makes sense some of them would post the horrible nonsense they did with mixed drivers floating around.
The performance is okay for a card that gets released to the public six months later.
I wouldn't see any reason for trading my 8800GTS for a 2900.
OK, finally someone figured it out...
http://www.computerbase.de/news/treiber ... vergleich/
Its in German but it tells the story. There is a driver bug, plain and simple. Depending on which version of driver was used the results will be skewed, and by quite a bit.
I am sure ATI is on it and will have it fixed quickly.
As you can see those show a far cry from what the review sites are posting and demonstrates the driver revision compared to the results. It makes sense some of them would post the horrible nonsense they did with mixed drivers floating around.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 492 guests