by congo » Sat Apr 22, 2006 9:49 am
It's not advertised as a San Diego is it? It's advertised as a 3700+ I believe.
Also, CPUZ did mis-inform at least one new 3700+ owner when it stated the CPU was a San Diego, when it clearly was not, because the CPU code showed otherwise. I believed CPUZ used a namestring to state the San Diego/Toledo or whatever name, but is it possible that it ID's it by the L2 cache being 1mb plus other parameters, or is it truly reading a namestring, because if it is, then AMD are using a San Diego namestring on a E6 stepping 3700+. Even if they are using the San Diego namestring, it's really going to be hard to cite misrepresentation when AMD can call their CPU's anything they want, as long as they don't misrepresent the specification, but, hey, I'm no lawyer either lol.
Wierd.
There are at least 3 models of 3700+ now. One is a
Last edited by
congo on Sat Apr 22, 2006 11:16 am, edited 1 time in total.

Mainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24&