cfs3 or PF

The latest Air Battle game from Microsoft! Running on an entirely new platform, CFS3 is raising it's fair share of problems & opinions - Good & Bad!

Re: cfs3 or PF

Postby Stormtropper » Mon Mar 14, 2005 10:25 pm

..and kids, that is why you shouldn't do drugs
Arizona State University
Viva la party!


Image
Stormtropper
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1237
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:49 pm
Location: Grosse Pointe, MI

Re: cfs3 or PF

Postby AvHistory » Tue Mar 15, 2005 3:50 am

[quote]

who told you that Pacific Fighters was designed to "historically re-create the major Pacific battles in the carrier wars & island hopping campaigns"?
Last edited by AvHistory on Tue Mar 15, 2005 4:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
AvHistory
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 577
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 12:06 pm
Location: NC, USA

Re: cfs3 or PF

Postby msalama » Fri Mar 18, 2005 4:16 am

Dear Mr. Bear,

As a long-time simulator hobbyist I was interested in trying out CFS3, regardless of all the critique and bad-mouthing it has received from the simming community. Your immature, insulting, boorish and obnoxious conduct in this forum has, however, evaporated my interest, because as an adult I definitely don't want to associate myself with individuals whose behaviour is as lamentable and childish as yours.

I find this a sad state of affairs not only for myself, but for the CFS3 community in general too, because I'm sure I'm not the only one put off by your lack of manners. Thus, I do sincerely hope that you understand this state of affairs yourself, and modify your conduct accordingly.

Yours Truly,

Markku Salama

Helsinki
Finland
Last edited by msalama on Fri Mar 18, 2005 4:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
msalama
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 4:40 am

Re: cfs3 or PF

Postby IndioBlack » Fri Mar 18, 2005 4:51 am

Hello Msalama. Welcome to the board. I see this is your first post. It's a shame that your first post is an attack on someone who has positively contributed to this board and CFS3 Simulation for quite some time.

You attack would have been more credible if you were already a veteran of this board yourself. In that way, we as a group would know who you were, where you were coming from and perhaps have some respect for your opinion.

Unfortunately, because you are a first time poster, your attack suggests that you are the type of person who drifts around message boards looking for trouble, or maybe a regular from the IL-2 boards wading in here to support your comrades; who are looking pretty foolish at the moment, if I may say so.

Everybody is entitled to their opinions, however misguided they may be. This includes you  of course.  So I hope you'll stick around here and post some more, and not just decide to leave the board because you are so angry at how you perceive it to be deteriorating.
That way we'll know you are a genuine board member and not just someone whose cerebellum has become a depository for excrement. 8)
User avatar
IndioBlack
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 266
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 9:16 am

Re: cfs3 or PF

Postby AvHistory » Fri Mar 18, 2005 8:29 am

Dear Mr. Bear,

As a long-time simulator hobbyist I was interested in trying out CFS3, regardless of all the critique and bad-mouthing it has received from the simming community. Your immature, insulting, boorish and obnoxious conduct in this forum has, however, evaporated my interest, because as an adult I definitely don't want to associate myself with individuals whose behaviour is as lamentable and childish as yours.

I find this a sad state of affairs not only for myself, but for the CFS3 community in general too, because I'm sure I'm not the only one put off by your lack of manners. Thus, I do sincerely hope that you understand this state of affairs yourself, and modify your conduct accordingly.

Yours Truly,

Markku Salama

Helsinki
Finland


Dear Markku,

Please do not confuse me with someone who gives a rats a-- about your opinion.

BEAR
User avatar
AvHistory
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 577
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 12:06 pm
Location: NC, USA

Re: cfs3 or PF

Postby msalama » Fri Mar 18, 2005 8:56 am

Dear Mr. Bear,

Thank you for your answer. It merely - and unfortunately - proves my first impression of you to be correct.

However, since I really don't have anything else - or anything constructive, at any rate - to say about this matter, I kindly ask the moderators to delete this account of mine immediately.

Yours Truly

Markku Salama

Helsinki
Finland
msalama
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 4:40 am

Re: cfs3 or PF

Postby Smoke2much » Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:14 am

Dear Pete, Moderators and all others who disagreed with my request to lock this topic,

Thank you so much for disagreeing with me.  This thread is providing me with the best entertainment I have had in a long time.  

Yours truly

Will ;D
Who switched the lights off?
User avatar
Smoke2much
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2755
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Sittingbourne, Kent,

Re: cfs3 or PF

Postby AvHistory » Fri Mar 18, 2005 12:56 pm


since I really don't have anything else - or anything constructive, at any rate - to say


Looks like we agree on something, Congratulations!!
Last edited by AvHistory on Fri Mar 18, 2005 1:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
AvHistory
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 577
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 12:06 pm
Location: NC, USA

Re: cfs3 or PF

Postby AvHistory » Fri Mar 18, 2005 1:01 pm

[quote]
User avatar
AvHistory
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 577
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 12:06 pm
Location: NC, USA

Re: cfs3 or PF

Postby Felix/FFDS » Fri Mar 18, 2005 1:12 pm

In the grand scheme of things, other than for business purposes, does it really matter whether CFS3 is "better" than PF?  

In some online games and forums, you constantly hear complaints about "You're in a Thunderbolt, you're cheating if you can outturn my Spit!"  - Of course, it all depends on flight attitudes, etc.  Then, there are the "whiners",  those that "of course" German/British/American/Japanese/Russian aircraft were "better", etc ad nauseam.  SO?  these are GAMES, "simulations" that are tempered by the necessity of playability. '

Maybe a more accurate question is:  Which set of compromises for the sake of playability do you like more - those included in CFS3 or those included in PF?
Felix/FFDS
User avatar
Felix/FFDS
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 16776435
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 9:42 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: cfs3 or PF

Postby Woodlouse2002 » Fri Mar 18, 2005 1:22 pm

[quote]In the grand scheme of things, other than for business purposes, does it really matter whether CFS3 is "better" than PF?
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!

Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains c
User avatar
Woodlouse2002
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10369
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2002 3:51 pm
Location: Cornwall, England

Re: cfs3 or PF

Postby Smoke2much » Fri Mar 18, 2005 1:34 pm

Maybe a more accurate question is:  Which set of compromises for the sake of playability do you like more - those included in CFS3 or those included in PF?


Well said!
Who switched the lights off?
User avatar
Smoke2much
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2755
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Sittingbourne, Kent,

Re: cfs3 or PF

Postby Felix/FFDS » Fri Mar 18, 2005 3:03 pm

I've got to say that both programs suck  :)

I haven't been able to get CFS3 running on my machine (and haven't taken the time to fine tune it or get the CFS3 Update) and I haven't bought PF2, therefore I'm a complete expert on the pros and cons of both programs.

Now, you want a REAL nerve shattering simulation?  ACES HIGH (or Warbirds, I'll concede).  Okay so you're limited to a specific set of airplanes (I still hold hope that some online simulation will decide to do a Gloster Gladiator and/or Fiat Cr.32), but when you can have 700+ online in the same arena at the same time, set up in three different "countries", that has more appeal to me than flying against the AI of (grudgingly admitted good) box simulations.

(Of course maybe the appeal of outlfying a Yak and a Spit9 in a Spit 1 has my idea of fun).

Then there are the multi-frame historical scenarios ...

Maybe - well, not maybe, for sure - the boxed game graphics and eye candy are better the that for the online games, but  ....

Oh well, to each his own poison.. :)
Felix/FFDS
User avatar
Felix/FFDS
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 16776435
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 9:42 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: cfs3 or PF

Postby dcunning30 » Fri Mar 18, 2005 3:46 pm

Amusing!

Now Bear,

you're giving that guy an excuse to go about telling his buddies how rude and crude us neanderthal americans are.  anyway, I bought PF with great expectation.  i'm not interested in online play.  i want historical simulation of the pacific war.  i've since uninstalled pf.  the last time i visited pf forums, there's an undercurrent of discontent that oleg has seemingly abandonded them.

oh well, i love cfs2.  though i haven't pulled the trigger yet, i expect i'll be owning cfs3 soon.

cheers!
TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS TASK FORCE 34 RR THE WORLD WONDERS
User avatar
dcunning30
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 5:34 pm
Location: The Land of Nod

Re: cfs3 or PF

Postby Microsoft Corporation » Fri Mar 18, 2005 5:12 pm

[quote]

Direct from the UBI & Maddox B__L S__T mill:

From the creators of the critically acclaimed IL-2 series comes an accurate and action-packed RE-CREATION of the epic battles of the Pacific

The award-winning flight combat from Oleg Maddox
Image

AvHistory
Gold Member Plus
***
Posts: 118
Re: cfs3 or PF
User avatar
Microsoft Corporation
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 189
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 3:56 pm
Location: Alameda County, Germany

PreviousNext

Return to Combat Flight Simulator 3

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 263 guests