










Layne is quite right here!
The Afterburner doesn't interact with the Runway long enough for it to melt the concrete, although I'm sure with prolonged exposure (over a minute or two), it might cause some small problems on the runway. More like tar, I'd guess.
It wouldn't melt a hole though.


thanks for listening




Layne is quite right here!
The Afterburner doesn't interact with the Runway long enough for it to melt the concrete, although I'm sure with prolonged exposure (over a minute or two), it might cause some small problems on the runway. More like tar, I'd guess.
It wouldn't melt a hole though.

ok first off i know that they use burners on a carrier hwever it is not advised to useburners on tarmac as it WILL melt and get scorched, an example of this was at riat 2005 where a typhoon pilot used his burners extreamly close to the runway similar to that of takw off and nearl lost his job as the runway was unserviceable for a while and unsafe to land on.
still not clear it up here is a little example of how they can be dangerous http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/VA-news/VA-Pi ... 300269.htm
not can we stop this here.



if i have to say this one more time i will phisically implode DONT USE BURNERS ON TAKE OFF you will phsically melt a hole in the runway!! you wiuldnt do it with an SR-71 blackbird so why with a hornet!!
Return to Simulation Screenshots Showcase
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 321 guests