Good Quality-Bad Quality.Which one is better?

[Boris_G]

Good



Bad

[A/SGT.Mav316]

Kinda sillt to ask you this, BUt why does the one that looks clear (the bad one) has  no detail in it.

but the one marked Good has a ton of detail in it but looks like crap.

Are we playing games with our CPU resolution here

[Boris_G]

Simple answer I wasnt intending to take good screenshot being actualy good, I just wanted to show the difference when you use everytihng max out and when you have not so maxed out.

[jubjub47]

The top pic would've looked great antialiased.  

[Lethal.Ambition]

Bad quality looks great.

Look at the grass in good, but the fudge are all those dots there for?! I mean look at that, looks so unreal, and look at the horizon, they fill it up with so much junk u can hardly see it and those clouds, oh wow 3-d wow lets all run around in circles and hail COF...they are just blocking your view!

Seriously now, you are there, all calm, and all of a sudden this white thing comes and blocks your view... ATC clears you to land and the damn puffy white thing is there. Now whats better, see through 2 d clods that once u get in that perfect spot the cloud runs out and u get the whole world in your view or 3-d in which u actually need to go to end of the cloud!

Come on guys.

Look at tha runway too. Hell, I was landing and saw all those marks that'd creep me out instead bad its like im the first person landing

and the detail if the plane, come on, its not like the pilot has a camera chasing him and he can see the darned plane all naked without a pain job, all he sees is cockpit

Now look at it my way and say you disagree.

[fido]

I agree with jub, I too prefer the first shot, I have flown in weather where the horizon was nearly blocked by clouds, as for the runway, I find the tire marks an easy way to judge whether or not I am going to overshoot my landings.  To each his own.

                                Fido  :)  :)