Thanks guys for the replies and the comments!!
I was in a 'letting off steam' mood last night - tomorrow my teaching semester starts and I'll be doing a 60 hr/week + for three months - I'm a lazy bugga so I'm none too pleased ;D
I don't want to get a reputation as an "MS-Basher" but with some of our most prominent members continually pushing the opposite view I do feel it needs, occasionally, someone to say the opposite.
If FSXI includes a MANAGEABLE user friendly programme that helps freeware - and even payware developers to put out tons of add-ons, then that's okay. But take it from me - I won't be the only one complaining if there are hardly any add-ons for FSXI for a year or two after release due to the massive complexity (and the fact that most people can't even afford the hardware for a while). Having seen CFS3 falter due to the lack of backwards compatitility (I believe) it is a question if it's really necessary to do away with it for the series to move forward. I'd be happy with the same engine as FSX, a bit better graphics - and a lot of QUALITY CONTENT out of the box in a game which is OPTIMISED for comps to run.
FSX looks quite good on my humble comp so I can't really complain. I found Accelleration with SP2 just destroyed my desire to play FS, that's all. A lot of people are using it without trouble or found work-arounds - good for them!! :)
Tonight if I get time I'm going to try to put some FS9 Czech scenery in FSX. Next shots from there.

Cheers
Krigl