Are these any better?

Showcasing specific payware addon products. This forum is where the aim of the shot is payware products. Please upload images to Simviation before posting

Are these any better?

Postby theduke » Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:37 am

The only thing I can do is change drivers.

     Image




     Image




     Image




     Image

If this doesn't work, there one more option..
AMD Athlon 64X2 dual core 6000+ processor,  Nvidia Geforce 8800 Ultra, 3 gig ram.
Image
User avatar
theduke
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 348
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 5:32 pm
Location: the world

Re: Are these any better?

Postby spitfire boy » Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:04 pm

They are better but the mesh still looks a bit rough in places... ;)
Image


[center]
User avatar
spitfire boy
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 4:46 pm
Location: Wherever you think I'm not

Re: Are these any better?

Postby J. » Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:28 pm

They are better but the mesh still looks a bit rough in places... ;)


are you talking about the mesh or the textures? because saying the mesh looks rough makes no sense at all to me.

all your shots have looked good duke, I don't quite understand what the others where complaining about, i see some blurred textures but meh who  really cares.
[center]
Striking software Beta Team leader | [url=http://twitter.com/strikingsw]Follow Striking Software on
J.
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1273
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 7:35 pm
Location: Herts/Worcs UK

Re: Are these any better?

Postby theduke » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:11 pm

I think I might have found at least part of the problem. Default FSX mess for Europe is only 76 meters. I did update the drivers to my card but I can't tell much difference.
AMD Athlon 64X2 dual core 6000+ processor,  Nvidia Geforce 8800 Ultra, 3 gig ram.
Image
User avatar
theduke
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 348
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 5:32 pm
Location: the world

Re: Are these any better?

Postby Soames » Thu Jan 31, 2008 6:05 pm

In the shots you show here, I don't think the mesh is a problem.

The snow textures on the other hand aren't brilliant, but what can you do? It's default FSX. One trick might be to introduce a couple of low level cloud layers to mask it's natural graininess. Go for a variety of different cloud types with fairly low coverage.

This is an example of one of my shots using clouds to mask a dodgy snow texture. Not brilliant, but it gives an idea.

If you do want to improve the mesh for Europe, have a look at the mesh downloads available on this site. I think France and the Alps are well covered.

As for drivers, I'm not sure. I'm afraid I'm guilty of not updating mine unless a specific problem is encountered with a specific piece of software.

In general I like these shots, they show off the plane well. As a child, I built a plastic model of a Bristol Fighter and like the other planes I gummed up and painted, I have a fondness for it.

It's odd, but after handling a scale model you have a strange intimacy with the plane and recognize details previously experienced through touch. On this plane I particularly remember the heavy stitching of the fuselage fabric and the grill on the nose.

Ahh! Airfix.
User avatar
Soames
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:15 am
Location: A Village t'wixt Bath & Wells

Re: Are these any better?

Postby Harold » Thu Jan 31, 2008 6:33 pm

all your shots have looked good duke, I don't quite understand what the others where complaining about, i see some blurred textures but meh who really cares.


It is not a problem J. If he's satisfied with them who are we to persuade him to change anything. I just see things and make suggestions. It is up to the Duke if he does something with that ...

As Soames suggested, check out the SimV FSX mesh ... I don't have FSX running so I cannot comment on then (I have FS Global 2008 on FS9 ;)) but the previous version was very nice ...

Actually the first thing I noticed (in the previous post) were the textures. There were large pixel shaped things (example here and here) in them that don't belong there. CERTAINLY NOT with GEX which I believe Duke is running.

Although it generally doesn't hurt to update your drivers, I don't think that that would solve this issue.

If this doesn't work, there one more option.


Before you take drastic measures try uninstalling GEX, making sure nothing is left behind. Make a screenshot in a (snowy/mountainous) location that you can easily remember. Reinstall GEX and configure it to your taste. Go to the same location as where you first took the screenshot and see if there is a change.

And try the mesh ... see if that makes a difference ;)

Good luck! Let us know how it went!
User avatar
Harold
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5906
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 5:13 am
Location: NL

Re: Are these any better?

Postby J. » Thu Jan 31, 2008 6:55 pm

those pixelated textures your looking at HK is the edge of teh snow texture i do believe, i get the same, i hate it!
[center]
Striking software Beta Team leader | [url=http://twitter.com/strikingsw]Follow Striking Software on
J.
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1273
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 7:35 pm
Location: Herts/Worcs UK

Re: Are these any better?

Postby spitfire boy » Fri Feb 01, 2008 2:56 am

I did mean textures.... sorry.

And yes, I hate pixellated snow edges too. ;D
Image


[center]
User avatar
spitfire boy
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 4:46 pm
Location: Wherever you think I'm not

Re: Are these any better?

Postby theduke » Fri Feb 01, 2008 6:57 am

I did mean textures.... sorry.

And yes, I hate pixellated snow edges too. ;D


I don't know for sure what was on the persons mind who designed those textures but I think it is supposed to be a transition between snow and earth so there isn't a sharp line dividing the two. That is my impression anyhow. I would also say that more time could have been spent on it. I found a shot from the same area in FS9. I believe I like the default FSX mesh and textures better than FS9.





Image
Last edited by theduke on Fri Feb 01, 2008 7:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
AMD Athlon 64X2 dual core 6000+ processor,  Nvidia Geforce 8800 Ultra, 3 gig ram.
Image
User avatar
theduke
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 348
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 5:32 pm
Location: the world

Re: Are these any better?

Postby spitfire boy » Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:47 am

FSX's default mesh is certainly better than FS9's.... me having had experience of both, like many... but some of FSX's default textures are a bit iffy.

I'm sure thaere's an add-on somewhere out there that fixes it, but having literally just transferred to FSX I have not yet started searching out add-ons in earnest. Still getting used to its little foibles. ;D
Last edited by spitfire boy on Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image


[center]
User avatar
spitfire boy
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 4:46 pm
Location: Wherever you think I'm not

Re: Are these any better?

Postby J. » Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:48 pm

I've downloaded the mesh that harold posted above, supposed 39m (or whatever res it was) mesh for the whole of europe :) my truested lovely england might come to life yet!
[center]
Striking software Beta Team leader | [url=http://twitter.com/strikingsw]Follow Striking Software on
J.
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1273
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 7:35 pm
Location: Herts/Worcs UK

Re: Are these any better?

Postby Harold » Fri Feb 01, 2008 4:14 pm

I thought you had UTX, GEX and FEX so what is all this fuss about default textures? If you have GEX then you should have the best ground textures available and - no offense - but I can't imagine this quality with GEX.
User avatar
Harold
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5906
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 5:13 am
Location: NL

Re: Are these any better?

Postby J. » Fri Feb 01, 2008 6:36 pm

i think you get it with GEX as well, il have a check tomorrow see what my sim throws at me
[center]
Striking software Beta Team leader | [url=http://twitter.com/strikingsw]Follow Striking Software on
J.
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1273
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 7:35 pm
Location: Herts/Worcs UK

Re: Are these any better?

Postby theduke » Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:52 pm

I thought you had UTX, GEX and FEX so what is all this fuss about default textures? If you have GEX then you should have the best ground textures available and - no offense - but I can't imagine this quality with GEX.

If you knew anything about FSX, you would know that GEX and UTX is for the US and Canada only right now. Those shots are from Europe which is still default. I have to post in the Payware section because of FEX. Check it out at http://www.flight1.com/products.asp?product=gexusacan You might ever find a screenshot there with snow textures like mine.
Last edited by theduke on Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
AMD Athlon 64X2 dual core 6000+ processor,  Nvidia Geforce 8800 Ultra, 3 gig ram.
Image
User avatar
theduke
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 348
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 5:32 pm
Location: the world

Re: Are these any better?

Postby yancovitch » Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:10 am

like the second...feeling of depth....kinda makes my heart beat go up :)
i7-7700k ....msi geforce gtx 1060....msi z270 gaming m5 lga 1151 motherboard....CORSAIR Vengeance LPX 16GB (2 x 8GB) ram.....
User avatar
yancovitch
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3530
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 12:48 pm
Location: born montreal, lived vancouver, now live in burns lake bc.

Next

Return to Payware Screenshot Showcase

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 352 guests