Experience

Let loose your artistic flair! No Rules except please keep shots within 380K & 2000 pixels wide.

Experience

Postby Mictheslik » Sun Jul 22, 2007 5:05 am

Experience shows its worth as a novice 109 pilot desperately dodges the lead of a battle hardened veteran.

Image

Click for large...

.mic
[center]Image
User avatar
Mictheslik
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5517
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:32 am
Location: Bristol, England

Re: Experience

Postby Layne. » Sun Jul 22, 2007 5:20 am

OH..... My God :o [smiley=laugh.gif]
Windows 7 Ultimate x64 | 22" LED Monitor (1920x1080) | AMD Phenom II x4 970 Black Edition~3.5Ghz | 4gb RAM | ATI Radeon 6850 1gb | 1Tb HDD

[img]http://www.simviation.com/phpupload/uploads/1302666610.
User avatar
Layne.
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2646
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 9:17 pm
Location: Australia, Victoria, Melbourne

Re: Experience

Postby matt2190 » Sun Jul 22, 2007 9:31 am

:o I am nominating this for the gallery.
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.2 GHz
2 GB Corsair Dominator PC2-8500
8800GTX 768MB
22" Monitor
Vista Ultimate
User avatar
matt2190
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1514
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 6:37 pm
Location: Pittsburgh,PA

Re: Experience

Postby ATI_7500 » Sun Jul 22, 2007 11:29 am

Right into the wing....ouch...
ATI_7500
 

Re: Experience

Postby Alonso » Sun Jul 22, 2007 8:04 pm

Wow... amazing edit, Mic, top quality! Well deserved nomination...
Image
Core i5 2500k @ 3.8 - 8GB DDR3 - GTX 560 OC
User avatar
Alonso
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2828
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 7:13 pm
Location: Lima, Peru

Re: Experience

Postby spitfire boy » Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:23 am

One itty-bitty anomaly in this shot...not that it matters at all, it's stunning regardless...

You see the bullets coming out of the wing nearest to the camera - i.e the port wing... why is it that if you follow that trail of bullets, they are hitting further starboard on the 109 than the bullets coming from the starboard wing... it's almost as if the paths of the bullets have crossed in mid-air, but we can't see this...

Like I said, it's irrelevant, this edit is fantastic. Better than I could ever do, that's for sure.
Last edited by spitfire boy on Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image


[center]
User avatar
spitfire boy
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 4:46 pm
Location: Wherever you think I'm not

Re: Experience

Postby Mictheslik » Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:30 am

One itty-bitty anomaly in this shot...not that it matters at all, it's stunning regardless...

You see the bullets coming out of the wing nearest to the camera - i.e the port wing... why is it that if you follow that trail of bullets, they are hitting further starboard on the 109 than the bullets coming from the starboard wing... it's almost as if the paths of the bullets have crossed in mid-air, but we can't see this...

Like I said, it's irrelevant, this edit is fantastic. Better than I could ever do, that's for sure.



LOL.....I never noticed that  ;D ;D ;D ;D

.mic
[center]Image
User avatar
Mictheslik
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5517
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:32 am
Location: Bristol, England

Re: Experience

Postby ATI_7500 » Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:23 am

Even if it's just by accident, the convergence effect is totally okay.


Not for the Hurri, but you should get the idea:
http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/weapon ... -5813.html


Although I had best experiences in IL-2 with 100-150 m for the 109.
ATI_7500
 

Re: Experience

Postby Sytse » Mon Jul 23, 2007 7:53 am

Very good.  :)
User avatar
Sytse
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3397
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 5:26 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Experience

Postby spitfire boy » Mon Jul 23, 2007 9:01 am

Even if it's just by accident, the convergence effect is totally okay.


Not for the Hurri, but you should get the idea:
http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/weapon ... -5813.html


Although I had best experiences in IL-2 with 100-150 m for the 109.


I was aware of the convergence effect before I saw this shot - what struck me as a little bit odd is that the bullet-paths seem to be running parallel to each other, and yet they 'swap round' so that they are hitting the opposite point on the 109 to where they should be hitting. If you look at the angle of the Hurri', the bullet lines actually make only a 90 degree twist, opposed to the other bullet-path, to end up strinking the 109 where they do. It's almost as if one of the guns is pointing straight ahead and the other one has been bent upwards.

Like I said before though, this is such a miniscule detail that even if anyone did notice it, they wouldn't really care - myself included, this tiny little confused area has done nothing to erode my view that this is a stunner of an edit.
Last edited by spitfire boy on Mon Jul 23, 2007 9:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image


[center]
User avatar
spitfire boy
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 4:46 pm
Location: Wherever you think I'm not

Re: Experience

Postby Mictheslik » Mon Jul 23, 2007 9:59 am

Even if it's just by accident, the convergence effect is totally okay.


Not for the Hurri, but you should get the idea:
http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/weapon ... -5813.html


Although I had best experiences in IL-2 with 100-150 m for the 109.


I was aware of the convergence effect before I saw this shot - what struck me as a little bit odd is that the bullet-paths seem to be running parallel to each other, and yet they 'swap round' so that they are hitting the opposite point on the 109 to where they should be hitting. If you look at the angle of the Hurri', the bullet lines actually make only a 90 degree twist, opposed to the other bullet-path, to end up strinking the 109 where they do. It's almost as if one of the guns is pointing straight ahead and the other one has been bent upwards.

Like I said before though, this is such a miniscule detail that even if anyone did notice it, they wouldn't really care - myself included, this tiny little confused area has done nothing to erode my view that this is a stunner of an edit.


Just think of it as an escher drawing ;)

.mic
[center]Image
User avatar
Mictheslik
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5517
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:32 am
Location: Bristol, England

Re: Experience

Postby Kleen Harry » Mon Jul 23, 2007 1:10 pm

Very nice, Mic!  :)

A few things to consider for you next image:

1) Canopy: Plexiglass should not be blue.

2) Antenna Wire: Picking up color from the paint on the vertical stab.

3) Lighting: The tail is one of the brightest areas on the left side of the fuse but the undersides of the horizontal stab and elevator are much less illuminated than the area under the wings.

Tallyho!  ;)
Kleen Harry
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 3:24 am

Re: Experience

Postby Mictheslik » Mon Jul 23, 2007 1:12 pm

Very nice, Mic!  :)

A few things to consider for you next image:

1) Canopy: Plexiglass should not be blue.

2) Antenna Wire: Picking up color from the paint on the vertical stab.

3) Lighting: The tail is one of the brightest areas on the left side of the fuse but the undersides of the horizontal stab and elevator are much less illuminated than the area under the wings.

Tallyho!  ;)



Cheers...

not too sure about 1

2...completely understand but havent got round to doing a new wire yet...

3...noticed soon after I posted...sorted on my current one which will be put up when I fix the wire problem ;)

.mic
[center]Image
User avatar
Mictheslik
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5517
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:32 am
Location: Bristol, England

Re: Experience

Postby Kleen Harry » Mon Jul 23, 2007 2:02 pm

Here's a fast and easy way to fix antenna wires, Mic, as long as they are still on a separate layer from the background:

1) Polygon Lasso tool

2) Make a rough selection around the portion of the wire you want to work on. Since it is on a separate layer there's no need to be real precise as only that one layer will be affected.

3) Image > Adjust > Hue and Saturation > Lightness

4) Reduce the lightness until the desired look is achieved.

You're done!  8-)
Kleen Harry
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 3:24 am

Re: Experience

Postby Immelman » Mon Jul 23, 2007 5:06 pm

I was aware of the convergence effect before I saw this shot - what struck me as a little bit odd is that the bullet-paths seem to be running parallel to each other, and yet they 'swap round' so that they are hitting the opposite point on the 109 to where they should be hitting. If you look at the angle of the Hurri', the bullet lines actually make only a 90 degree twist, opposed to the other bullet-path, to end up strinking the 109 where they do. It's almost as if one of the guns is pointing straight ahead and the other one has been bent upwards.

Like I said before though, this is such a miniscule detail that even if anyone did notice it, they wouldn't really care - myself included, this tiny little confused area has done nothing to erode my view that this is a stunner of an edit.


I noticed this too SB.  It's just a matter of perspective.  The upper tracers are coming from the left gun, but the hit the wing to the right of the lower bullets which are coming out of the right gun.  But like you said, it's just a small detail.
User avatar
Immelman
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 409
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 7:37 pm

Next

Return to Edited Screenshots

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 506 guests