It Has Been Discussed, But Just to Clarify

Discussion on Specific Aircraft Types. Close up photos particularly welcome. Please keep ON TOPIC :)

It Has Been Discussed, But Just to Clarify

Postby an-225 » Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:05 am

Harrier ownership - is it LEGAL? I want to see if I can acquire a Sea Harrier FRS.1 (consider the variant, this version is not a killing machine like the FA.2 or AV-8B II and people have acquired "tame" aircraft, such as the DeHavilland Sea Vixen and North American F-86 Sabre). Furthermore, once acquired, is it legal to fly (and eventually VTOL) it? I believe because of its poor glide rate, it is not allowed to fly over London.
an-225
 

Re: It Has Been Discussed, But Just to Clarify

Postby Mictheslik » Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:09 am

In america....yes

not sure about Australia though ;)

.mic
[center]Image
User avatar
Mictheslik
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5517
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:32 am
Location: Bristol, England

Re: It Has Been Discussed, But Just to Clarify

Postby C » Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:29 am

Ownership is legal, flying it may not be, depending on your location (and whether or not you are a multimillionaire).

I want to see if I can acquire a Sea Harrier FRS.1 (consider the variant, this version is not a killing machine like the FA.2 or AV-8B II


I think more people were killed by FRS.1s than by FA.2s - just ask the Argentine Air Force and Navy.

The other problem is that most FRS.1s became the FA.2s.
Last edited by C on Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: It Has Been Discussed, But Just to Clarify

Postby expat » Sun Dec 16, 2007 10:14 am

I believe because of its poor glide rate, it is not allowed to fly over London.


Poor ;D, it does not have one ;D

Matt
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....

Re: It Has Been Discussed, But Just to Clarify

Postby Isak922 » Sun Dec 16, 2007 7:27 pm

I know in the States that it's legal to own MiG-21's and such. Just can't pass the sound barrier within 20 miles of US land (Overseas, and over 20 miles out, you could probably ask ATC permission for it).

I've also heard rumors that there's at least one Civilian owned Su-27 State-side. Not sure if it's ever flown though. Would certainly be a nice "toy".

Some people have Ferrari's and BMW's.... He has a Sukhoi Heavy Fighter ::)
4GB DDR2 PC5300; 3.2GHz Pentium D 940, Nvidia 9800GT 1024MB DDR3, Windows XP Pro SP3
User avatar
Isak922
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1484
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:09 pm
Location: Connecticut

Re: It Has Been Discussed, But Just to Clarify

Postby an-225 » Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:30 am

I know in the States that it's legal to own MiG-21's and such. Just can't pass the sound barrier within 20 miles of US land (Overseas, and over 20 miles out, you could probably ask ATC permission for it).

I've also heard rumors that there's at least one Civilian owned Su-27 State-side. Not sure if it's ever flown though. Would certainly be a nice "toy".

Some people have Ferrari's and BMW's.... He has a Sukhoi Heavy Fighter ::)


Pffft, getting an Su-27 is easy. You upscale Revell of Germany's Su-27 model (which is part T10) and add all the crucial parts to make it fly. The Airfix FRS.1 lacks surface detail, and the Italeri SHAR has poor fit issues (I am guessing on both accounts). ;)

Thanks for the help guys, this provides a helpful insight into Harrier ownership for me.  :)
an-225
 

Re: It Has Been Discussed, But Just to Clarify

Postby Ashar » Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:26 pm

I dunno how you'll afford a multi million dollar Harrier, but good luck...Post some pics! :D
Blabbing Away at SimV Since June 8, 2004
Ashar
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4041
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:13 am
Location: Ottawa, Ontario

Re: It Has Been Discussed, But Just to Clarify

Postby mrjake2002 » Fri Dec 21, 2007 2:17 pm

I'd go for something gentle... like a Chippie!
Last edited by mrjake2002 on Fri Dec 21, 2007 2:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[url]http://www.flickr.com/gravityxgrace[/url]
mrjake2002
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2243
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 4:42 am
Location: Cornwall, UK.

Re: It Has Been Discussed, But Just to Clarify

Postby Layne. » Sat Dec 22, 2007 2:55 am

I would rather get my hands on an F-22 ::)

But heaps of people own guns as protection why not a harrier ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Windows 7 Ultimate x64 | 22" LED Monitor (1920x1080) | AMD Phenom II x4 970 Black Edition~3.5Ghz | 4gb RAM | ATI Radeon 6850 1gb | 1Tb HDD

[img]http://www.simviation.com/phpupload/uploads/1302666610.
User avatar
Layne.
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2646
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 9:17 pm
Location: Australia, Victoria, Melbourne

Re: It Has Been Discussed, But Just to Clarify

Postby Craig. » Sat Dec 22, 2007 8:19 pm

A little insight into harrier ownership. Hovering a harrier for any period of time will require upon landing, a full engine strip and overhaul, which I believe is a rather long and difficult job when done by the RAF's finest. ;)
Good luck with that.

Reality is, not only is the plane one of the toughest and most dangerous military jets to fly, but it is also one of the most labour intensive.
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Re: It Has Been Discussed, But Just to Clarify

Postby Dr.bob7 » Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:48 pm

its pry legal, BAE pry just tears the weapon mounts off and sends it to you
Dr.bob7
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1364
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:03 pm
Location: Castle Rock Colorado

Re: It Has Been Discussed, But Just to Clarify

Postby an-225 » Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:12 am

Do they ship it in that foamy squiggly packaging? Lol, that would be great, thanks for the info. ;)
an-225
 

Re: It Has Been Discussed, But Just to Clarify

Postby Souichiro » Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:33 pm

Now I thought I read something about a EE lightning being made flyable in the U.S.?
Image
User avatar
Souichiro
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:34 am

Re: It Has Been Discussed, But Just to Clarify

Postby C » Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:10 pm

Now I thought I read something about a EE lightning being made flyable in the U.S.?


A T.5 was being restored in Mississippi. It hasn't flown so the only airworthy EE Lightnings are in SA at Thunder City...

Here's a link:

http://www.lightningusa.org/about.html
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: It Has Been Discussed, But Just to Clarify

Postby expat » Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:45 pm

A little insight into harrier ownership. Hovering a harrier for any period of time will require upon landing, a full engine strip and overhaul, which I believe is a rather long and difficult job when done by the RAF's finest. ;)
Good luck with that.

Reality is, not only is the plane one of the toughest and most dangerous military jets to fly, but it is also one of the most labour intensive.



Depending on the air temperature you are generally limited to 90 seconds. Why 90 seconds, thats how long you have in water quantity (50 gallons) that is spayed into the combustion chamber so that the engine does not require the above strip down. However, here is the shock part of Harrier ownership. The engine will require strip down as a matter of course after 500 hours..................if you manage to get it that far in the first place. The Harrier's Pegasus has so many STI's, SI's and general maintenance that you will always find something that will require an engine change well before 500 hours. Also don't forget, the wing has to come off. Back in my days of life in a blue suit, we would recon three days to change one with an experienced crew.

Matt
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....


Return to Specific Aircraft Types

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 432 guests