SR-71

Discussion on Specific Aircraft Types. Close up photos particularly welcome. Please keep ON TOPIC :)

SR-71

Postby Wing Nut » Sat Aug 20, 2005 7:59 pm

Hey, is it true that the Blackbird uses so much fuel on takeoff, she has to refuel once airborne?
[img]http://www.simviation.com/phpupload/uploads/1440377488.jpg[/img]
User avatar
Wing Nut
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 12720
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2002 6:25 am

Re: SR-71

Postby Mynameisnemo » Sat Aug 20, 2005 8:07 pm

Hey, is it true that the Blackbird uses so much fuel on takeoff, she has to refuel once airborne?


just found this for you from http://www.sr-71.org/blackbird/sr-71/

After the SR-71 takes off, it has a rendezvous with a KC-135Q tanker seven minutes later. The SR-71 takes off with a very light fuel load and after this refueling, the plane can fly up to 2,500 miles without refueling. The aircraft then accelerates to speed and altitude which is about Mach 3.2 at 85,000 feet


Is that the info that you require?
Mynameisnemo
 

Re: SR-71

Postby Craig. » Sat Aug 20, 2005 8:09 pm

Its not just that it uses alot of fuel. It actually leaks from the skin of the plane i believe.
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Re: SR-71

Postby Mynameisnemo » Sat Aug 20, 2005 8:11 pm

Its not just that it uses alot of fuel. It actually leaks from the skin of the plane i believe.


You are correct in the fuel leaking out

In order for the SR-71 to fly the worldwide missions, it has a special fleet of modified KC-135Q tankers for refueling. SR-71s run on JP-7 fuel, that fills the six large tanks in the fuselage. The component parts of the Blackbird fit very loosely together to allow for expansion at high temperatures. At rest on the ground, fuel leaks out constantly, since the tanks in the fuselage and wings only seal at operating temperatures. There is little danger of fire since the JP-7 fuel is very stable with an extremely high flash point.
Mynameisnemo
 

Re: SR-71

Postby Wing Nut » Sat Aug 20, 2005 8:30 pm

Works for me...  ;D
[img]http://www.simviation.com/phpupload/uploads/1440377488.jpg[/img]
User avatar
Wing Nut
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 12720
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2002 6:25 am

Re: SR-71

Postby krigl » Wed Aug 24, 2005 6:01 am

Just passing through....  in the documentation for Richard Barker's Blackbird it has some interesting stuff about the plane... including that the temperature of the windshield grew so hot during flight that the pilots cooked their lunch on it. I read that 52s also do the same thing with refueling shortly after takeoff, simply because with a full fuel load they are too heavy to get airborne...  :)
If you're bored of an evening - and you'll have to be - you can check out my screenshot gallery: Kriglsflightsimscreens...HERE

[center][img]http://www.simviation.com/phpup
krigl
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8234
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:47 am

Re: SR-71

Postby Mr. Bones » Thu Sep 01, 2005 11:57 am

Ok, about the fuel stuff. (out of the head after reading several books of former SR pilots) The Blackbird never took off with full tanks because of the weight of the plane. I say never but that isn't really correct. The NASA guys often did it, but normally a Blackbird never takes off with a full load. Shortly after take off, it would refuel to a full load of 80 000pounds. I think they used to take off with 65 000 pounds. It was possible, but not worth the risk in case of an aborted take off.

It's true the fuel tanks leaked while on the ground. The reason is that it was impossible to overcome this because of the many cooling wires that went in and out of the tanks.

About cooking the lunch on the winshield...don't really believe that. The pilots were strapped in in a pressure suit with their helmets closed. They had a bag of water on the inside but as far as I know, they never opened their helmet to eat. They only opened it when they were about to land. I recall reading a text about a pilot who was talking about his longest mission, 11 hours. For that time, he was breathing pure oxygen inside his suit, his eyes became very dry. On final, his lost his vision. Don't really know how to say this, but he managed to press a tear out of his eyes to make them humid again. After that, he vision returned so he could make an uneventfull landing.

Another fact about the Blackbird is that because of the extreme heating, the airframe became stronger after each flight.

Another one: during cruise, a Blackbird never flew level. When it burned fuel, it became lighter so the optimal cruise altitude always had to be a little bit higher. Therefore, the jet always cruised at a rate of climb of 100ft/minute.

You want more facts about this amazing jet? When some pop up in my head, I'll post them here.  ;)
Raw power...the J-58.
Image

My Anet collection.
Mr. Bones
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3969
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2002 10:32 am

Re: SR-71

Postby ozzy72 » Thu Sep 01, 2005 12:03 pm

http://www.sr-71.org/blackbird/manual/index.htm some light reading for you Kevin ;)
Image
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
User avatar
ozzy72
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 33284
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 4:45 am
Location: Madsville

Re: SR-71

Postby Craig. » Thu Sep 01, 2005 12:26 pm

and here i was expecting it to open with.
Welcome to your brand new SR71. ;D
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Re: SR-71

Postby ozzy72 » Thu Sep 01, 2005 12:29 pm

And today in our used plane lot we have..... ;D
Image
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
User avatar
ozzy72
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 33284
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 4:45 am
Location: Madsville

Re: SR-71

Postby Gary R. » Tue Oct 11, 2005 11:46 am

Just caught this old thread.  Very interesting.  Some of the facts I already knew.  I know the 71's records will probably not be exceeded for years to come yet.  I also suspect that the plane was never flown at it's absolute limits when setting these records due to the fact that the U.S. government wanted to keep the published limits in line with the preformance.  No doubt, the plane could easily best it's own records.  I say this because in Xplane 7 the blackbird there does perform better than the real world published capabilities including altitude.  I've had it over fl 100.  I know Xplane's flight modeling is very exact but I just wonder if it's advanced enough to calculate the compressor stall altitude of any given engine?  I do know I lost control surface resistance when I exceeded fl100.  
AMD 2800xp on gigabyte vt600l k7 triton overclocked @ 2.3 ghz, 768 PC 3200, 128 DDR 6600GT AGP, 60 gig,5200 rpm maxtor, 160gig 7200rpm WD, Sony FD Trinitron 19
Gary R.
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2003 10:51 am
Location: PA, USA

Re: SR-71

Postby Mr. Bones » Wed Oct 12, 2005 1:45 pm

I guess you mean FL1000. FL100 = 10 000ft which even a C172 can reach.  ;D

Not sure about the Blackbird though.
Raw power...the J-58.
Image

My Anet collection.
Mr. Bones
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3969
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2002 10:32 am

Re: SR-71

Postby Gary R. » Wed Oct 12, 2005 6:32 pm

Oh gee, i forgot that last 0. DOH!!!  Anyway, I would highly recommend Xplane for their SR-71 alone.  Actually, it's worthwhile for any exotic plane because there is no altitude limit as in FS.  Also, the sky does get very dark up that high and the suborbital scenery depiction looks a lot like space shuttle shots.  Very nice.  Til you get in an uncontrollable yaw at least  because there isn't any air to work against the control surfaces.
AMD 2800xp on gigabyte vt600l k7 triton overclocked @ 2.3 ghz, 768 PC 3200, 128 DDR 6600GT AGP, 60 gig,5200 rpm maxtor, 160gig 7200rpm WD, Sony FD Trinitron 19
Gary R.
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2003 10:51 am
Location: PA, USA

Re: SR-71

Postby Boss_BlueAngels » Fri Nov 04, 2005 6:13 pm

I read someplace that the jet also grows about 3 inches due to thermal expansion and changes color from black to a very dark blue.  
The day is always better when you're flying upside down.

www.fight2flyphoto.com

Canon RebelXT
Canon 18-55mm
Sigma 10-20mm F/4-6.3
Sigma 100-300mm F/4-6.3
Sigma 50-500mm F/4-6.3
User avatar
Boss_BlueAngels
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 696
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 6:12 pm
Location: Snohomish

Re: SR-71

Postby congo » Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:34 pm

The SR-71 is a "Devil Plane", dripping with the blood of the arch-angel's after heavenly and holy combat......... God won and grounded the fleet. See photo evidence below.

http://www.sr-71.org/photogallery/black ... 930-12.jpg
ImageMainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24&
User avatar
congo
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3655
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2002 12:13 am
Location: Australia

Next

Return to Specific Aircraft Types

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 449 guests