For me you can't beat a mark V, although in its blue colour scheme K5054 was a very pretty aeroplane.
Had R J Mitchell survived into the jet age would have much changed? - I'm not sure on this one, I reckon the logical progression of the Spit overseen by Joseph Smith would have continued. On the other hand we may have seen Mitchell's 4 engine bomber take to the skies.... On the jet side, who knows...
Surely youv'e heard about how the Americans used P-38's in the D-day invasions? They used it because they thought that even the Americans would recognize such a distinctive silhouette and (maybe) not shoot at it...
You call it running away, I call it making a tactical withdrawal.
Agreed Doug, its the school of thought I come from. The MkIX/VIII were fantastic and the ultimate evolution of the Merlin Spit, and I wouldn't mind either however
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
[quote]It's not like I have anything against earlier Marks.
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!
Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains c
Again I am forced to notice the difference in opinion lies along the line of country of origin. Americans tend (not always) to like later models while Brits (again, not always) prefer the earlier. I wonder how much of that is because the Spitfire is your own and the role is played in what really was Britain's finest hour. I would say if that is the case, you have every right to be proud of the earlier Marks...