69 years ago

Discussions on History. Please keep on topic & friendly. Provocative & one sided political posts will be deleted.

69 years ago

Postby myshelf » Sat May 06, 2006 4:50 pm

which conspiracy do you prefer on the hindenburg dissaster?
the reasonable man adjusts to his souroundings, while the unreasonable man insists on adjusting his souroundings to him.

therefore all progress is due to the unreasonable man.
myshelf
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 294
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:05 pm

Re: 69 years ago

Postby Theis » Sun May 07, 2006 3:23 am

None..

It was an accident..

Just bad weather, the ended in a tragic crash..

Just because something goes wrong, there dosn't has to be a "Conspiracy" about it..

Example: That carcrash last week, Accident or conspiracy?

was it on purpose, that lady missed the bus?

Everything dosn't has to be a conspiracy..

Sh!t happens, and not always for a reason!

Cheers Theis
Image Bar by Mees
Image
User avatar
Theis
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4846
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 6:16 am
Location: Denmark

~

Postby Scorpiоn » Sun May 07, 2006 5:20 pm

The one where U-21 sank the Titanic, causing the captain to fire a flare which was intercepted by aliens in outer space, once they found out what it was, they got so angry at wasting a research grant from Xangrious 5Delta-9 that they relighted it threw  it back down to Earth and it caught the Hindenburg fire, the aliens gave advance warning to the fathers of Elvis and Kennedy though, so they were spared injury in the crash, but their sons set out to avenge the aliens treachery toward humanity by faking their deaths, joining the US government and working in area 51, where they developed a secret missile that fooled people into thinking it was an aeroplane and carried out the 9-11 attacks with government funding.  They blamed it on that poor Osama.  What a sham!  He was on Xangrious 5Delta-8 at the time! :P The government lies! Image
The Devil's Advocate.
Image
User avatar
Scorpiоn
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3734
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 7:32 pm
Location: The Alamo

Re: 69 years ago

Postby TacitBlue » Sun May 07, 2006 5:32 pm

Wow Scorp, you read my mind... ;) ::)
Image
A&P Mechanic, Rankin Aircraft 78Y

Aircraft are naturally beautiful because form follows function. -TB
User avatar
TacitBlue
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3856
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 12:33 pm
Location: Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA

Re: ~

Postby cspyro21 » Fri May 12, 2006 3:56 pm

The one where U-21 sank the Titanic, causing the captain to fire a flare which was intercepted by aliens in outer space, once they found out what it was, they got so angry at wasting a research grant from Xangrious 5Delta-9 that they relighted it threw  it back down to Earth and it caught the Hindenburg fire, the aliens gave advance warning to the fathers of Elvis and Kennedy though, so they were spared injury in the crash, but their sons set out to avenge the aliens treachery toward humanity by faking their deaths, joining the US government and working in area 51, where they developed a secret missile that fooled people into thinking it was an aeroplane and carried out the 9-11 attacks with government funding.  They blamed it on that poor Osama.  What a sham!  He was on Xangrious 5Delta-8 at the time! :P The government lies! Image


??? ;D
User avatar
cspyro21
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4987
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 6:11 am

Re: 69 years ago

Postby Felix/FFDS » Fri May 12, 2006 5:27 pm

On a serious note, it appears that the Hindenburg carried the seeds of its own destruction.

A documentary presented the conclusion that the Hindenburg's fabric covering was doped with a cocktail of substances that while they preserved and protected, were also highly flammmable themseves, which is why the fire spread so fast.  Instead of being fire retardant, the fabric was actually a fire enhancer!  This, according to Zeppelin's own investigation, the results of which, naturally, were suppressed.
Felix/FFDS
User avatar
Felix/FFDS
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 16776435
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 9:42 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: 69 years ago

Postby H » Fri May 12, 2006 11:43 pm

...the Hindenburg's fabric covering was doped with a cocktail of substances that while they preserved and protected, were also highly flammmable themseves, which is why the fire spread so fast.  Instead of being fire retardant, the fabric was actually a fire enhancer!  This, according to Zeppelin's own investigation, the results of which, naturally, were suppressed.
And, now that we're all aware, you're telling us it wasn't a very good cover-up? ??? 8)

Mentioning cover-ups, one of these days some one of you is going to find me and I'm going to be smothered in a layer or so of thick goo! :P
H
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5525
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:27 am
Location: NH, USA

~

Postby Scorpiоn » Sat May 13, 2006 3:39 pm

On a serious note, it appears that the Hindenburg carried the seeds of its own destruction.

A documentary presented the conclusion that the Hindenburg's fabric covering was doped with a cocktail of substances that while they preserved and protected, were also highly flammmable themseves, which is why the fire spread so fast.  Instead of being fire retardant, the fabric was actually a fire enhancer!  This, according to Zeppelin's own investigation, the results of which, naturally, were suppressed.

If we watched the same documentary, the undeniable proof was when the NASA guy (who worked with hydrogen a lot) cut a strip of some remaining Hindenburg fabric and applied some electricity to it...

Poof! ::)

Expensive proof indeed.
Last edited by Scorpiоn on Wed May 17, 2006 12:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Devil's Advocate.
Image
User avatar
Scorpiоn
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3734
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 7:32 pm
Location: The Alamo

Re: 69 years ago

Postby myshelf » Sat May 13, 2006 7:26 pm

as i understand it the inner side and the outer side of the fabric were treated with some chemicals that when put together would selfignite in damp air.
the fabric itself should keep them apart but over time there might have been some detoriation.
the reasonable man adjusts to his souroundings, while the unreasonable man insists on adjusting his souroundings to him.

therefore all progress is due to the unreasonable man.
myshelf
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 294
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:05 pm

Re: 69 years ago

Postby Ivan » Fri May 19, 2006 1:43 pm

Static discharge + venting = possible disaster
Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and [url=http://an24.uw.hu/]An-24RV[/ur
Ivan
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5805
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 8:18 am
Location: The netherlands

~

Postby Scorpiоn » Fri May 19, 2006 3:14 pm

There are many things that could have gone wrong with Hindenburg, due to it's inherent design, however only one theory is glaring guilty.  As Felix brought up, the Hindenburg's skin was covered in materials flammable when exposed to electricity.  The landing zone was a cesspool of static electricity.  I doubt I'll hear a better theory.
The Devil's Advocate.
Image
User avatar
Scorpiоn
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3734
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 7:32 pm
Location: The Alamo


Return to History

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 537 guests