Concorde

Discussions on History. Please keep on topic & friendly. Provocative & one sided political posts will be deleted.

Re: Concorde

Postby Hagar » Wed Nov 09, 2005 1:43 pm

[quote]...You're the official simviation spelling police?
Last edited by Hagar on Wed Nov 09, 2005 1:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30864
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: Concorde

Postby dcunning30 » Wed Nov 09, 2005 2:02 pm

Official no, but he is quite right. Nothing ticks me off more than people referring to it as "the Concorde"



Heh,

Personally, I get ticked off by things like, say, ummm, injustice, poverty....  but everyone's got their own hot button, I suppose.   ::)
TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS TASK FORCE 34 RR THE WORLD WONDERS
User avatar
dcunning30
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 5:34 pm
Location: The Land of Nod

Re: Concorde

Postby Hagar » Wed Nov 09, 2005 2:29 pm

[quote]Heh,

Personally, I get ticked off by things like, say, ummm, injustice, poverty....
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30864
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: Concorde

Postby TacitBlue » Wed Nov 09, 2005 2:34 pm

A LOT of people think that there is only one Concorde for some reason. When ever it comes up in RL conversation (which is rare) I try to nicely inform people of the truth just like any other subject.
Dcunning30: No one meant any offence. Lighten up a bit. ;)
Image
A&P Mechanic, Rankin Aircraft 78Y

Aircraft are naturally beautiful because form follows function. -TB
User avatar
TacitBlue
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3856
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 12:33 pm
Location: Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA

Re: Concorde

Postby dcunning30 » Wed Nov 09, 2005 2:53 pm

TacitBlue

I see your point.  This thread has been hijacked over spelling.  I fear I'll give more fodder for spelling corrections in the near future.  I live by spelling and grammar checkers.   :'(

Anyway, according to that PBS documentary, Concorde became victim of environmental and noise polliution ordinances, which doomed it's feasibility to be economically successful.
TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS TASK FORCE 34 RR THE WORLD WONDERS
User avatar
dcunning30
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 5:34 pm
Location: The Land of Nod

Re: Concorde

Postby Hagar » Wed Nov 09, 2005 3:00 pm

I repeat. No offence was intended & I pointed that out not so much as a spelling mistake but as a matter of interest. If I caused any offence by doing so I sincerely apologise but if I have to add a disclaimer to every single remark I make my already lengthy posts will be twice as long. :o ;)

Anyway, according to that PBS documentary, Concorde became victim of environmental and noise polliution ordinances, which doomed it's feasibility to be economically successful.

Quite correct although Concorde was killed off by politics more than anything else. The pollution issues were a convenient excuse.

PS. You might have noticed that I probably make more typos than anyone else on this forum.  I can spell fine & this is due to the fact that I'm possibly the world's worst typist & the reason most of my posts are edited at least once. ::)
Last edited by Hagar on Wed Nov 09, 2005 3:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30864
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: Concorde

Postby TacitBlue » Wed Nov 09, 2005 3:03 pm

Speaking of super sonic passenger jets, heres an interesting news article I spotted the other day on the subject- http://www.aviationnow.com/avnow/news/channel_awst_story.jsp?id=news/11075p1.xml
Image
A&P Mechanic, Rankin Aircraft 78Y

Aircraft are naturally beautiful because form follows function. -TB
User avatar
TacitBlue
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3856
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 12:33 pm
Location: Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA

Re: Concorde

Postby C » Wed Nov 09, 2005 6:07 pm

Anyway, according to that PBS documentary, Concorde became victim of environmental and noise polliution ordinances, which doomed it's feasibility to be economically successful.


Certain elements always had it in for Concorde (mentioning no names) whether using the political or "environmental" (watch out for those "cosmic rays"!). But put it this way, the maiden passenger voyage of this awesome transatlantic supersonic airliner was to Bahrain, not JFK, if you get my drift... ;) :)
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Concorde

Postby H » Thu Nov 10, 2005 2:52 am

I have to admit that some of these little things like spelling ... ...incorrectly irritate me although I rarely mention it. On the rare occasion that I did someone takes offence & jumps down my throat. ;)
No one meant any offence.
I repeat. No offence was intended & I pointed that out not so much as a spelling mistake but as a matter of interest. If I caused any offence by doing so I sincerely apologise...PS. You might have noticed that I probably make more typos than anyone else on this forum.  I can spell fine & this is due to the fact that I'm possibly the world's worst typist & the reason most of my posts are edited at least once. ::)
Does this mean that we're off the "fence" and nothing is 'foiled'? No offense intended. ;) ;D ;D 8)
H
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5525
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:27 am
Location: NH, USA

Re: Concorde

Postby Hagar » Thu Nov 10, 2005 3:25 am

Does this mean that we're off the "fence" and nothing is 'foiled'? No offense intended. ;) ;D ;D 8)

LOL :D The American form of spelling is another thing that irritates me, especially when I have to use it myself for programming my computer. >:( Two great countries separated by a common language. ::) ;)
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30864
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: Concorde

Postby Ivan » Thu Nov 10, 2005 4:00 am

Not certain about fatal flaws as I believe they had more than one accident. It came out later that the first highly publicised one at the Paris Air Show was caused by the pilot trying to avoid a collision with French Air Force Mirage spy planes that weren't supposed to be there & flew too close to it. At least one example was purchased by NASA & used for experimental work long after it was officially withdrawn from service. http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/news/FactSheets/FS-062-DFRC.html

The NASA one proved that the LL version (Tu-144D with Tu-160 engines) flew better than the Concorde even though the engine mods completely messed up the throttle system
Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and [url=http://an24.uw.hu/]An-24RV[/ur
Ivan
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5805
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 8:18 am
Location: The netherlands

Re: Concorde

Postby H » Thu Nov 10, 2005 4:30 am

LOL :D The American form of spelling is another thing that irritates me, especially when I have to use it myself for programming my computer. >:( Two great countries separated by a common language. ::) ;)
Uh-huh... our flags don't have the same colors even though they do. 8)
H
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5525
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:27 am
Location: NH, USA

Re: Concorde

Postby Mictheslik » Sat Nov 26, 2005 4:26 am

Last flight 2 years today  :'(.
I remember standing up on clifton downs watching her fly over the suspension bridge.
[center]Image
User avatar
Mictheslik
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5517
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:32 am
Location: Bristol, England

Re: Concorde

Postby 4_Series_Scania » Sun Nov 27, 2005 8:34 pm

Quite correct although Concorde was killed off by politics more than anything else. The pollution issues were a convenient excuse.



It was 9/11 as I understand it that killed of Concorde, or, more to the point, her most regular paying customers.....

Fear & simple economics did the rest, and what a damn shame.  >:(

2 Years? My! Thats flown, unlike Concorde!
:( ;)
Posting drivel here since Jan 31st, 2002. - That long!
"He who laughs last, thinks slowest."
User avatar
4_Series_Scania
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3194
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 4:34 pm
Location: Newport Shropshire U.K.

Re: Concorde

Postby Woodlouse2002 » Sun Nov 27, 2005 8:53 pm

Politics killed Concorde. Not economics. British Airways made nothing but a profit with Concorde right up to the end.
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!

Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains c
User avatar
Woodlouse2002
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10369
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2002 3:51 pm
Location: Cornwall, England

PreviousNext

Return to History

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 312 guests