http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... found.html
I wonder what went wrong there?
Paul.
Anyone know her?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... found.html
I wonder what went wrong there?
Paul.
Anyone know her?
The plane took off @ 0330 from Monterrey. With a VFR ONLY commercial ticket (the image)... violation of Night VFR Rules?
Also... look at the last sentence on the Certificate... does FAR Part 135 apply?
The plane took off @ 0330 from Monterrey. With a VFR ONLY commercial ticket (the image)... violation of Night VFR Rules?
Also... look at the last sentence on the Certificate... does FAR Part 135 apply?
This is just the FAA part though. The same narrative also says to be used in conjunction with Mexico Pilot License No xxxxxxx etc.
So although a document bound to be in all the papers due the condition it was found, and, at face value, its controversial content, possibly a bit of a red herring. The Lear is also a 2 pilot aeroplane, so it's entirely possible he was co, and operating to the privileges of the Captain's license (whether legally or not is another matter).
We shall see.
The plane took off @ 0330 from Monterrey. With a VFR ONLY commercial ticket (the image)... violation of Night VFR Rules?
Also... look at the last sentence on the Certificate... does FAR Part 135 apply?
This is just the FAA part though. The same narrative also says to be used in conjunction with Mexico Pilot License No xxxxxxx etc.
So although a document bound to be in all the papers due the condition it was found, and, at face value, its controversial content, possibly a bit of a red herring. The Lear is also a 2 pilot aeroplane, so it's entirely possible he was co, and operating to the privileges of the Captain's license (whether legally or not is another matter).
We shall see.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 180 guests