Short version
http://www.eaa.org/news/2012/2012-08-28 ... t-reno.asp
Full NTSB brief
http://www.ntsb.gov/news/events/2012/reno_nv/index.html
The full brief is an interesting read. It seems there may have to be a culture change in unlimited air racing, and certainly it appears there will be a lot of engineering work (evaluation, testing and certification) in the near future if some of the top unlimiteds are in the same boat that "Galloping Ghost" was. In some ways, although a tragic loss of life, being at Reno there was plenty of visual evidence to help assess the cause.
I can see the logic of the high g recommendations, but sadly, as often the case with a structural failure at these speed, in this case even a G-suit would have been futile with a near instant application of 17G.
About the regulations of the racers, Im torn. On the one hand you cant argue with safety, but on the other, anyone that has read through aviation history knows how air racing today is very small and very fragile compared to the 'Golden Years' when air racing was popular. I regularly have to explain the Reno Air Races to even aviation minded people. The main stream media only talks about it when there is a crash and even the main stream sports networks do not cover it. My point, more regulations could just push air racing even closer to extinction.
It seems there may have to be a culture change in unlimited air racing, and certainly it appears there will be a lot of engineering work (evaluation, testing and certification) in the near future if some of the top unlimiteds are in the same boat that "Galloping Ghost" was.
This class of air racing is called Unlimited for a reason,Its a test bed for going as fast as you can,with "No limits".
This class of air racing is called Unlimited for a reason,Its a test bed for going as fast as you can,with "No limits".
Yeah, and you can still do that. It's just what's been recommended is that heavily structurally modified aircraft are done so in a tested and controlled fashion. No one's saying anything about limiting the performance, just achieving it using a sound engineering process.![]()
Tuning an engine to 1000hp greater than production hp, then just clipping the wings and putting a bigger rudder on just doesn't cut it anymore.
VERY very true. Im sure a lot of ground crews are getting really nervous about the mods the have done to their planes....Precious Metal, Rare Bear, Strega, and Czech Mate Im talking to you....
VERY very true. Im sure a lot of ground crews are getting really nervous about the mods the have done to their planes....Precious Metal, Rare Bear, Strega, and Czech Mate Im talking to you....
Hopefully they've done the work, or are doing it. Galloping Ghost's crash was worrying in that it was a component that you'd think on all the various Mustang unlimiteds seemed untouched; the tailplane.
That said, I can't think of any other unlimiteds in recent history which have suffered a structural failure. All the incidents in recent memory before this were mainly engine related.
One that always springs to my mind....>>>
Yak 50.
http://shortfinals.wordpress.com/2011/0 ... us-winner/
Paul.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 329 guests