Invisible Russian

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby Slotback » Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:22 pm

The Russian do have a love affair with HUGE intakes on fighter aircraft....not exactly stealthy

F-22, YF-23 & F-35 have huge intakes at the front. What makes the intakes stealthy is mainly because they block view of the engines from all angles, and also because the intakes are fixed.
Last edited by Slotback on Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Slotback
 

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby C » Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:36 am

The Russian do have a love affair with HUGE intakes on fighter aircraft....not exactly stealthy

F-22, YF-23 & F-35 have huge intakes at the front. What makes the intakes stealthy is mainly because they block view of the engines from all angles, and also because the intakes are fixed.


Indeed, and if you want smaller intakes, then you'd be paying a performance penalty.

Simplistically, big powerful engine = big intake! :)
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby expat » Sat Jan 30, 2010 8:18 am

And congress still thinks it's a good idea to quit making F-22s? I just hope Lockheed doesn't destroy the tooling..



Would not be the first time, still................."no we can't start the line up, but what we can do is start on the development of
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby The Ruptured Duck » Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:18 pm

[quote]Well, there are only so many ways to make an effective stealth fighter, so it's a given that some aspects are going to look similar among aircraft. Obviously many people are going to jump on the "Russians are copying us again" thing which has been popular to do since the start of the Cold War.
Maybe I am just more in tune with some aspects of Russian/Ukranian aircraft design, but I can see clear, original elements of Sukhoi craftsmanship in this airplane. You can really see the Su-27 series lineage here. I hope it does well.
"If you would not be forgotten, as soon as you are dead and rotten, either write things worth reading, or do things worth the writing" -Ben Franklin

"Man must rise above the Earth to the top of the atmosphere and beyond, for only
User avatar
The Ruptured Duck
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2282
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:56 pm
Location: Wichita, KS

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby C » Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:51 pm

[quote]
Russians copying US designs?
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby OVERLORD_CHRIS » Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:51 pm

And congress still thinks it's a good idea to quit making F-22s? I just hope Lockheed doesn't destroy the tooling. That looks like a cross between the YF-23 and SU-27.
Ahh You beat me to it!, that's was how I described it to my boss last night when I showed it to him at work.


If PAK FA stands for: Perspektivnyi Aviatsionnyi Kompleks Frontovoi Aviatsyi - Future Air Complex for Tactical Air Forces- Why does every one keep naming the plane PAK FA? They said it was the T-50 until Sukhoi gives it its Su designator, and yet every time I read  post about it, out side of here, they saying "The new Russian PAK FA flown today or what ever"
Image
User avatar
OVERLORD_CHRIS
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1136
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:56 am
Location: Chalreston SC

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby ShaneG_old » Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:48 pm

If PAK FA stands for: Perspektivnyi Aviatsionnyi Kompleks Frontovoi Aviatsyi ... Why does every one keep naming the plane PAK FA?



Because it just rolls off the tongue so easily.
Last edited by ShaneG_old on Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ShaneG_old
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 9700
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:52 am

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby C » Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:54 pm

[quote]

If PAK FA stands for: Perspektivnyi Aviatsionnyi Kompleks Frontovoi Aviatsyi - Future Air Complex for Tactical Air Forces- Why does every one keep naming the plane PAK FA? They said it was the T-50 until Sukhoi gives it its Su designator, and yet every time I read
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby machineman9 » Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:00 pm

The Russian do have a love affair with HUGE intakes on fighter aircraft....not exactly stealthy

F-22, YF-23 & F-35 have huge intakes at the front. What makes the intakes stealthy is mainly because they block view of the engines from all angles, and also because the intakes are fixed.

Theres a video of the F22 somewhere where the intake design is shown. They couldn't show you the engine from the front simply because the intakes bent around such corners that it was impossible for them to get the camera in to show you.

The T-50 isn't very pretty, but I've come to just accept that Russian aircraft seem to 'do the job' rather than look pretty. If it works, it works. Why complicate things?
Last edited by machineman9 on Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
machineman9
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4816
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:05 am

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby DaveSims » Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:11 pm

[quote][quote]Well, there are only so many ways to make an effective stealth fighter, so it's a given that some aspects are going to look similar among aircraft. Obviously many people are going to jump on the "Russians are copying us again" thing which has been popular to do since the start of the Cold War.
Maybe I am just more in tune with some aspects of Russian/Ukranian aircraft design, but I can see clear, original elements of Sukhoi craftsmanship in this airplane. You can really see the Su-27 series lineage here. I hope it does well.
User avatar
DaveSims
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2350
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 2:59 am
Location: Clear Lake, Iowa

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby expat » Mon Feb 01, 2010 2:10 am

[quote][quote][quote]Well, there are only so many ways to make an effective stealth fighter, so it's a given that some aspects are going to look similar among aircraft. Obviously many people are going to jump on the "Russians are copying us again" thing which has been popular to do since the start of the Cold War.
Maybe I am just more in tune with some aspects of Russian/Ukranian aircraft design, but I can see clear, original elements of Sukhoi craftsmanship in this airplane. You can really see the Su-27 series lineage here. I hope it does well.
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby machineman9 » Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:16 pm

[quote][quote]Well, there are only so many ways to make an effective stealth fighter, so it's a given that some aspects are going to look similar among aircraft. Obviously many people are going to jump on the "Russians are copying us again" thing which has been popular to do since the start of the Cold War.
Maybe I am just more in tune with some aspects of Russian/Ukranian aircraft design, but I can see clear, original elements of Sukhoi craftsmanship in this airplane. You can really see the Su-27 series lineage here. I hope it does well.
User avatar
machineman9
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4816
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:05 am

Previous

Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 440 guests