Invisible Russian

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Invisible Russian

Postby ozzy72 » Fri Jan 29, 2010 6:17 am

Image
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
User avatar
ozzy72
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 33284
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 4:45 am
Location: Madsville

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby expat » Fri Jan 29, 2010 6:34 am

The Russian do have a love affair with HUGE intakes on fighter aircraft....not exactly stealthy :-?

I myself love the term "all-weather capability". It is banded about by just about every aircraft maker in the world and used by the military to justify buying a new product almost as a standard one liner. All-weather capability used in connection with aircraft................that is like describing my as an "all round sportsman"
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby Rich H » Fri Jan 29, 2010 11:52 am

What model is it? Reminds me of the Su-47.
Image

"Politics" is made up of two words, "Poli", which is Greek for "many", and "tics", which are blood sucking insects. - Gore Vidal
User avatar
Rich H
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2017
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:40 am
Location: Solihull, U.K.

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby SeanTK » Fri Jan 29, 2010 12:41 pm

Very interesting!

Looks like a pancaked Su-27! You can definitely tell that it is a Sukhoi design.
Last edited by SeanTK on Fri Jan 29, 2010 12:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
SeanTK
 

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby C » Fri Jan 29, 2010 1:16 pm

Is anyone missing some pieces of aeroplane in the USA. Namely the rear end of a YF-23, the major proportion of an F-22 and half an F-35! ;D
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby SeanTK » Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:13 pm

Well, there are only so many ways to make an effective stealth fighter, so it's a given that some aspects are going to look similar among aircraft. Obviously many people are going to jump on the "Russians are copying us again" thing which has been popular to do since the start of the Cold War.
Maybe I am just more in tune with some aspects of Russian/Ukranian aircraft design, but I can see clear, original elements of Sukhoi craftsmanship in this airplane. You can really see the Su-27 series lineage here. I hope it does well.  :)
SeanTK
 

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby specter177 » Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:17 pm

And congress still thinks it's a good idea to quit making F-22s? I just hope Lockheed doesn't destroy the tooling. That looks like a cross between the YF-23 and SU-27.
Last edited by specter177 on Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImage
User avatar
specter177
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1369
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 2:33 pm
Location: KDAY

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby C » Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:32 pm

[quote]Well, there are only so many ways to make an effective stealth fighter, so it's a given that some aspects are going to look similar among aircraft. Obviously many people are going to jump on the "Russians are copying us again" thing which has been popular to do since the start of the Cold War.
Maybe I am just more in tune with some aspects of Russian/Ukranian aircraft design, but I can see clear, original elements of Sukhoi craftsmanship in this airplane. You can really see the Su-27 series lineage here. I hope it does well.
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby expat » Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:53 pm

And congress still thinks it's a good idea to quit making F-22s? I just hope Lockheed doesn't destroy the tooling..



Would not be the first time, still................."no we can't start the line up, but what we can do is start on the development of  the F-23A and it will only cost......."

Matt
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby ShaneG_old » Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:34 pm

So much for Sukhoi's run of beautiful, graceful looking planes.  :(

That thing looks like the Frankenstein of fighters.  :P
ShaneG_old
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 9700
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:52 am

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby C » Fri Jan 29, 2010 4:16 pm

[quote]So much for Sukhoi's run of beautiful, graceful looking planes.
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby skoker » Fri Jan 29, 2010 4:24 pm

I still see it...



;D
Image
User avatar
skoker
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4260
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:19 pm
Location: 1G3

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby SeanTK » Fri Jan 29, 2010 4:28 pm

The more I look at it, the more I like it. I wasn't quite sure how to react to it at first, but it does look pretty cool in my opinion.

Oh, and that comparison comment I brought up was just a preemptive observation not directed with ill intent at anybody. I've been on so many forums where anything Russian is hated with a passion, so I'm always on guard and ready to jump when stuff like this comes up.
Last edited by SeanTK on Fri Jan 29, 2010 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
SeanTK
 

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby C » Fri Jan 29, 2010 4:45 pm

[quote]The more I look at it, the more I like it. I wasn't quite sure how to react to it at first, but it does look pretty cool in my opinion.

Oh, and that comparison comment I brought up was just a preemptive observation not directed with ill intent at anybody. I've been on so many forums where anything Russian is hated with a passion, so I'm always on guard and ready to jump when stuff like this comes up.
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Invisible Russian

Postby SeanTK » Fri Jan 29, 2010 8:33 pm

I can't confirm this yet from multiple sources, but the current word is that the NATO reporting name is or will be: "Firefox".

If true, that's just awesome.
Last edited by SeanTK on Fri Jan 29, 2010 8:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
SeanTK
 

Next

Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 512 guests