Toxic Planes

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Toxic Planes

Postby Rich H » Sat Sep 26, 2009 6:00 am

http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/ne ... 270978.stm
I remember seeing a program about this a year ago or so, what causes it? Faults with the engines and plane, or just bad maintenance?
Image

"Politics" is made up of two words, "Poli", which is Greek for "many", and "tics", which are blood sucking insects. - Gore Vidal
User avatar
Rich H
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2017
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:40 am
Location: Solihull, U.K.

Re: Toxic Planes

Postby expat » Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:56 am

http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8270000/8270978.stm
what causes it? 


How long have we been flying pressurised aircraft, 50 plus years and this is only just coming to light. Sorry, but the amount of people reporting the effects in comparison to the amount that have flown/piloted over this time length leaves me a little sceptical.

Matt 
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....

Re: Toxic Planes

Postby eno » Sat Sep 26, 2009 3:16 pm

It's the same with lots of things ........ we have so many ways of having information distributed and so fast that it seems there's more happening than before.

I suspect that everyone who has ever flown in a pressurised aircraft has experienced some of the reported effects at one time or another, they have just put it down to jet lag or the effects of foreign climbs.

I'm not going to dismiss the problem as being trivial ...... but as Matt has said it's just more reported and maybe not as problematic as it seems.
[align=center][img]http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/imaginsigeno.jpg[/img][/align]
User avatar
eno
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 6708
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2004 12:30 pm
Location: Derbyshire UK

Re: Toxic Planes

Postby machineman9 » Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:49 pm

[quote][quote]http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8270000/8270978.stm
what causes it?
User avatar
machineman9
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4816
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:05 am

Re: Toxic Planes

Postby Hagar » Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:24 am

Rather odd that BALPA specifies the BAe 146 & Boeing 757 for being the worst offenders. If this is the case surely it wouldn't be too difficult to pinpoint the cause. Presumably the air-conditioning & pressurisation systems are basically the same on all large jet aircraft. The first question I would ask is; from the large variety of airliners in use all over the world, what is different with these systems on these two particular types that is likely to cause the problem?
Last edited by Hagar on Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30864
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: Toxic Planes

Postby expat » Sun Sep 27, 2009 10:20 am

Rather odd that BALPA specifies the BAe 146 & Boeing 757 for being the worst offenders. If this is the case surely it wouldn't be too difficult to pinpoint the cause. Presumably the air-conditioning & pressurisation systems are basically the same on all large jet aircraft. The first question I would ask is; from the large variety of airliners in use all over the world, what is different with these systems on these two particular types that is likely to cause the problem?


Whist I am sceptical of the effects that are reported, I can confirm that the BAe 146 is as about as bad as it gets when it comes to fumes in the aircraft not just the cockpit. I worked for about 5 years on this aircraft type and the number of times that we had problems, I lost count. The main problem is that the engine on the 146 is a bastard child. It started life as a tank engine, then was adapted to choppers and then ended up in the 146. Still once we are all flying on the Dreamliner it will be a problem of yesterday.

Matt
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....

Re: Toxic Planes

Postby Ivan » Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:54 pm

Dont forget the amount of smelly new plastic and recycled cigarette smoke inside the ventilation system
Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and [url=http://an24.uw.hu/]An-24RV[/ur
Ivan
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5805
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 8:18 am
Location: The netherlands


Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 320 guests