Is this true?

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Is this true?

Postby Rich H » Thu Aug 13, 2009 2:19 pm

I always thought the RN were going to operate the F-35B STOVL from ther new carriers, but I guess I'm wrong.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/08/06 ... _carriers/
Image

"Politics" is made up of two words, "Poli", which is Greek for "many", and "tics", which are blood sucking insects. - Gore Vidal
User avatar
Rich H
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2017
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:40 am
Location: Solihull, U.K.

Re: Is this true?

Postby C » Thu Aug 13, 2009 3:16 pm

Yes.
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Is this true?

Postby Mictheslik » Thu Aug 13, 2009 3:49 pm

Really? It has been discussed on other Forums and there are quotes from the guy in charge of defence procurement that no decision has been made yet....would certainly be a blow to a lot of my friends who have connections at the RR plant at Filton if it is true...

Starting to wonder why we got ourselves involved with Dave in the first place.....

.mic
Last edited by Mictheslik on Thu Aug 13, 2009 3:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[center]Image
User avatar
Mictheslik
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5517
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:32 am
Location: Bristol, England

Re: Is this true?

Postby C » Thu Aug 13, 2009 4:18 pm

Makes sense really. STOVL is nice on a carrier, but catapult/wire leaves the operation a more capable warfighting airframe. For the RAF STOVL/VTOL is essentially a redundant capability now, so the increase commonality may be an advantage.
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Is this true?

Postby Craig. » Thu Aug 13, 2009 5:07 pm

For a little bit of info.
The RN's F35 was designed based on a very loose set of requirements. As I said before, they never stated it had to be capable of STOVL fully loaded. Only capable of it. So empty it's more than able to fulfill the task. Fully loaded, it wouldn't have much chance of it.
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Re: Is this true?

Postby expat » Thu Aug 13, 2009 11:03 pm

So we are actually in danger of having a real aircraft carrier with a real catapult and real arrestor wires :-?............The thought of this is having effects on parts of me it probably shouldn't :-X

Kleenex anyone

Matt
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....

Re: Is this true?

Postby Mictheslik » Thu Aug 13, 2009 11:55 pm

So we are actually in danger of having a real aircraft carrier with a real catapult and real arrestor wires :-?............The thought of this is having effects on parts of me it probably shouldn't :-X

Kleenex anyone

Matt


That's a classy video Matt....nice find
Last edited by Mictheslik on Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
[center]Image
User avatar
Mictheslik
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5517
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 11:32 am
Location: Bristol, England

Re: Is this true?

Postby Bruce448 » Fri Aug 14, 2009 1:39 am

Prior to me leaving the Fleet Air arm we did some case studies for this aircraft and the new carriers, with the loose set of drawings and requirements for the aircraft and the carriers STOVL was never going to happen the aircraft was getting heavier by the day and was getting to the stage that it was unable to carry any weapon fit even in the conventional flight mode and on landing it would go through the flight deck.
Image
User avatar
Bruce448
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 863
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:55 am
Location: Here

Re: Is this true?

Postby Fozzer » Fri Aug 14, 2009 5:47 am

So we are actually in danger of having a real aircraft carrier with a real catapult and real arrestor wires :-?............The thought of this is having effects on parts of me it probably shouldn't :-X

Kleenex anyone

Matt


That's a classy video Matt....nice find
Win 8.1 64-bit. DX11. Advent Tower. Intel i7-3770 3.9 GHz 8-core. 8 GB System RAM. AMD Radeon HD 7700 1GB RAM. DVD ROM. 2 Terra Byte SATA Hard Drive. Philips 17" LCD Monitor. Saitek Cyborg X Fly-5 Joystick. ...and a Briggs and Stratton Petrol Lawn Mower.
User avatar
Fozzer
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 27361
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 3:11 pm
Location: Hereford. England. EGBS.

Re: Is this true?

Postby EJW » Fri Aug 14, 2009 11:23 am

Thats good! :)
EJW
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2760
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 7:06 am
Location: Lincolnshire, UK

Re: Is this true?

Postby expat » Fri Aug 14, 2009 11:47 am

Prior to me leaving the Fleet Air arm we did some case studies for this aircraft and the new carriers, with the loose set of drawings and requirements for the aircraft and the carriers STOVL was never going to happen the aircraft was getting heavier by the day and was getting to the stage that it was unable to carry any weapon fit even in the conventional flight mode and on landing it would go through the flight deck.



A prime example of trying to better something that is already perfect. The Harrier my be old (ish), but just like the B52, it is the only aircraft that can do what it does. Trying to redesign and better it with modern ideas, nine times out of ten you end up with something that looks good, but when you look closer you see it has a pronounced limp.

Matt
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....


Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 487 guests