Rio flight missing?

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Re: Rio flight missing?

Postby Excalibur372 » Thu Jun 04, 2009 1:08 pm

It's so amazing how big jets like airbus can be brought down by nature. We try to make planes so safe these days. So sad. :( :(
lifes a beach.
not.
User avatar
Excalibur372
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:52 pm
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana KBTR

Re: Rio flight missing?

Postby expat » Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:48 pm

Update:

Doomed Air France Flight 447's last terrifying few minutes in the air have already been pieced together by accident investigators.
Aviation sources in France said automated messages sent by the plane's systems had allowed them to reconstruct events which appeared to show the Airbus broke up in mid-air as it flew through a hugely violent storm carrying 228 people from Rio to Paris.

The pilot sent a manual signal at 11pm local time saying he was flying through an area of CBs - electrically charged cumulonimbus clouds that come with violent winds and lightning.
Satellite data has shown that towering thunderheads were sending 100 mph updraft winds into the jet's flight path at the time, several hundred miles of the coast of Brazil.

Ten minutes later, a cascade of problems began: automatic messages to Air France HQ indicate the autopilot had disengaged, a key computer system switched to alternative power, and controls needed to keep the plane stable had been damaged. An alarm sounded indicating the deterioration of flight systems.

Three minutes after that, more automatic messages reported the failure of systems to monitor air speed, altitude and direction. Control of the main flight computer and wing spoilers failed as well. The last automatic message, at 11.14pm, signalled loss of cabin pressure and complete electrical failure - catastrophic events in a plane that was likely already plunging toward the ocean.

The French accident investigation agency, BEA, refused to comment on the findings, as did Brazil's defence minister Nelson Jobim who said the "investigation is being done by France; Brazil's only responsibility is to find and pick up the pieces".

Meanwhile, the pilot of a Spanish airliner flying near where the Airbus is believed to have gone down reported seeing a bright flash of white light that quickly plunged to the ocean, said a spokesman for the Spanish airline Air Comet.

"Suddenly, off in the distance, we observed a strong and bright flash of white light that took a downward and vertical trajectory and vanished in six seconds," the pilot wrote in a report for the airline and Spanish civil aviation authorities.

The Spanish plane was flying from Lima, Peru to Madrid. The pilot said he heard no emergency calls.



I am rather interested to know, how a aircraft suffering "catastrophic electrical failure" was able to still send out so much information. The system that sends this information is done via the ACARS computer and uses if memory serves, VHF on radio mode control panel three. If no other radios were working, why was this one, it all goes through the same boxes and antennas? The BEA have a habit of telling the story that Air France want to tell :-?

Matt
Last edited by expat on Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....

Re: Rio flight missing?

Postby The-Black-Sheep » Fri Jun 05, 2009 5:46 am

I actually wondered about the ACARS myself. You're correct in saying it is sent over VHF...so damn...I'm confused now aswell  :-/

Alec
FAC: "It sounds pretty bad"

Jerry Shriver: "No, no. I've got 'em right where I want 'em - surrounded from the inside."

Jerry M Shriver - M.I.A 24th Arpil 1969, Cambodia
User avatar
The-Black-Sheep
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 364
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 3:05 pm
Location: South Wales

Re: Rio flight missing?

Postby DaveSims » Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:59 pm

Sounds like now they aren't even sure they found the wreckage, just a bunch of trash floating around the ocean.  Maybe it was hijacked and few to Africa or remote South America and hidden.
User avatar
DaveSims
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2350
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 2:59 am
Location: Clear Lake, Iowa

Re: Rio flight missing?

Postby pete » Fri Jun 05, 2009 2:39 pm

Sounds like now they aren't even sure they found the wreckage, just a bunch of trash floating around the ocean.  Maybe it was hijacked and few to Africa or remote South America and hidden.



Well it would have been on radar if it had  ....


The thing that strikes me is .. It did not apparently 'land' (ditch) on the ocean   - so we can only assume a crash - which would mean a catastrophic breakup on impact  - & a whole pile of stuff in an aircraft will float - lots of foam, insulation, rubbers, plastics, etc.

Hopefully we will find out more soon ..
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication. – Leonardo da Vinci
User avatar
pete
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 10235
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Cloud Cuckoo Land

Re: Rio flight missing?

Postby Rocket_Bird » Fri Jun 05, 2009 3:54 pm

I am rather interested to know, how a aircraft suffering "catastrophic electrical failure" was able to still send out so much information. The system that sends this information is done via the ACARS computer and uses if memory serves, VHF on radio mode control panel three. If no other radios were working, why was this one, it all goes through the same boxes and antennas? The BEA have a habit of telling the story that Air France want to tell :-?

Matt


Yes.. that is curious indeed, though would not the batteries or the ram air turbine (if there was electrical failure) to supply enough power for VHF or SATCOM to operate?
Cheers,
RB

Image
User avatar
Rocket_Bird
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1222
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Rio flight missing?

Postby expat » Sat Jun 06, 2009 4:22 am

[quote][quote]Sounds like now they aren't even sure they found the wreckage, just a bunch of trash floating around the ocean.
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....

Re: Rio flight missing?

Postby Hagar » Sat Jun 06, 2009 4:41 am

I've been away while this has been going on but the news reports I've seen appear to be mostly based on pure supposition. From what I can make out, nobody can possibly know exactly where to look for any wreckage as they don't know when or where during the flight the events took place. The remains could be anywhere in a very large area of ocean.

If reports that the aircraft disintegrated in mid-air & not on contact with the sea are correct any wreckage will be spread over a wide area. There is already a large amount of debris (sea trash) spread over the ocean so identifying what might be very tiny parts of an aircraft in terrible weather conditions could be very difficult, if not impossible.

What puzzles me is that the "authorities" seem so certain of what happened. This makes me wonder if they know more than they're prepared to admit.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30864
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: Rio flight missing?

Postby Alejandro Rhodes » Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:27 am

Yeah, I don't understand the media , I saw days ago in cnn
confirm found parts of the plane
Now Brazil saids confirm that those are not the rest of the aircraft  :-/

That mmeans  No buddy knows for sure IF the plane really crash?Would you imagine if the plane was hijacked  :o  
Alejandro Rhodes
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 6:33 am

Re: Rio flight missing?

Postby Brando14100 » Sat Jun 06, 2009 1:22 pm

They've found two bodies and a briefcase:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/brazil_plane

So sad.  :'(

8-)
Brando14100
 

Re: Rio flight missing?

Postby Steve M » Sat Jun 06, 2009 1:46 pm

I heard that 4 days before this flight, Air France had to deal with a bomb threat on another flight out of Rio. My source was news radio so I won't bother linking it, nothing was found on the aircraft at that time.
But pitot tube or bomb, end result is similar.
Image
User avatar
Steve M
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4765
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:02 pm
Location: Cambridge On.

Re: Rio flight missing?

Postby Craig. » Sat Jun 06, 2009 6:32 pm

Steve, that was actually a flight out of argentina and was a hoax, but yes an airfrance flight was delayed for that reason.
Nothing should be ruled out. There is just as much reason to suggest this could have been a bomb as well as a freak weather accident.
One of the quickest and easiest ways to tell whether this was a midair or near to or ground caused break up will be the debris spread. If its more than a few miles apart then it was a midair thing, if its confined then it went into the water in fairly one piece. It should be possible even with a mid ocean accident to figure that one out. A mid air break up would make finding parts easier as silly as it sounds, the lighter stuff will hit the water at a much slower speed and is less likely then to submerge immediately.
The recovered bodies will also tell a story as to what might have happend.
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Re: Rio flight missing?

Postby expat » Sun Jun 07, 2009 3:15 am

It's so amazing how big jets like airbus can be brought down by nature. We try to make planes so safe these days. So sad. :( :(


The Air Bus has a trick that the Boeing does not have during severe turbulence. As we know ailerons are one up and one down during deflection. Air Bus also use them to limit wing deflection and wing loading during severe turbulence. If the aircraft detects severe turbulence then the flight control computers will deflect the ailerons up at the same time to aerodynamically force the wings to go down. Roll is still controlled by a slight difference in the upward movement if required.

Matt
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....

Re: Rio flight missing?

Postby Brando14100 » Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:59 am

Brando14100
 

Re: Rio flight missing?

Postby expat » Sun Jun 07, 2009 12:06 pm

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090607/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/brazil_plane

:'(

8-)


Would not be the first aircraft lost to bad pitot information. At night you have no reference and have to believe your instruments. If memory serves, a Brazilian 737-800 was lost a few years back at night. The aircraft had been washed and believe it or not, the static ports had been waterproofed with cello tape :o During walk around, naturally the pilot did not spot this. The long and the short of the tale was constant under and over speed indications. Also the crew thought they where at 9000 feet and descending when in fact they where at 400 feet and descending. As you can imagine it ended in a big splash and a memorial service. If the computers where giving false information or the pitot system had frozen (anti ice failure???) then at night they were on a hiding to nothing :'(

Matt
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....

PreviousNext

Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 456 guests