Heres how I broke it down:
The Stinson was doing touch and goes and flying the pattern correctly, however despite having a radio, was not making radio calls, although not being required to make any calls.
The Baron was flying IFR in VFR conditions, and entered from the northeast. He said that ATC reported no traffic, however he is still responsible for collison avoidance once ATC services are cancelled (and really even before). He made a bogus pattern entry, although not required to cross over midfield.
As the Baron entered the upwind leg, or a false final, the Stinson was also about to turn final, but had to make a 360 turn to avoid the Baron. The Stinson pilot saw the Barons move as showboating, and the Baron saw the Stinson as being an inconsiderate putknocker.
Although both pilots weren't doing exactly what they were supposed to be doing, I have to lay blame on the Baron for this near miss. If he would have entered the pattern by crossing over midfield, the Stinson would have been no factor. What do you guys think?
All the time while they were arguing I was standing behind a Citation laughing my ass off!

