Minimum distance?

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Minimum distance?

Postby Ijineda » Tue Jul 31, 2007 3:49 am

On a recent flight to Dublin we encountered a Eva Air Cargo MD-11 over Amsterdam heading the opposite direction. It was so damn close that I could have read the Reg if it wouldnt have passed that fast. So I
Intel Quad Core 2 Extreme Q6600 @ 2.60GHz - Radeon HD 4850 - P5N-D - 4 GB RAM
Ijineda
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 875
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 8:36 am
Location: Vienna, Austria

Re: Minimum distance?

Postby C » Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:01 am

[quote]On a recent flight to Dublin we encountered a Eva Air Cargo MD-11 over Amsterdam heading the opposite direction. It was so damn close that I could have read the Reg if it wouldnt have passed that fast. So I
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Minimum distance?

Postby Nexus » Tue Jul 31, 2007 12:49 pm

From our (Sweden) AIP

"3.0.8  AREA NAVIGATION (RNAV)

Note 32. It is recommended that operators, who have equipment flying with "off-set" function, use OFF-SET RIGHT 0.1 NM when flying enroute on ATS-routes in order to reduce the risk of mid-air collision (NOT to be used during Approach/STAR or Departure/SID phases of flight)"

Might shed some lights on the issue. Not sure how often operators actually do this  :-?
Nexus
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3240
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 4:18 pm

Re: Minimum distance?

Postby ozzy72 » Tue Jul 31, 2007 1:16 pm

A bit like the old joke "A guy and his wife are flying off on holiday when there is a huge scream from most of the people in the plane, the husband turns to the wife and says 'I think we just had a near miss but I'm not sure as another plane got between us!'" ;D
Image
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
User avatar
ozzy72
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 33284
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 4:45 am
Location: Madsville

Re: Minimum distance?

Postby C » Tue Jul 31, 2007 2:37 pm

From our (Sweden) AIP

"3.0.8  AREA NAVIGATION (RNAV)

Note 32. It is recommended that operators, who have equipment flying with "off-set" function, use OFF-SET RIGHT 0.1 NM when flying enroute on ATS-routes in order to reduce the risk of mid-air collision (NOT to be used during Approach/STAR or Departure/SID phases of flight)"

Might shed some lights on the issue. Not sure how often operators actually do this  :-?



Sounds very sensible. I can't say I've ever seen anything similar in the UK AIP, but then again my time flying SID/STARS and Airways is relatively little...
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Minimum distance?

Postby Spartan03 » Tue Jul 31, 2007 2:41 pm

I don't know what the distance is for aircraft traveling side by side, (as in your description) i do know that (im guessing you were on a heavy aircraft) heavy aircraft cannot be any closer than 4nm behind each other because of jetwash concerns.
Image
User avatar
Spartan03
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 12:42 pm

Re: Minimum distance?

Postby AA » Sat Aug 04, 2007 6:59 pm

I know that in the US above FL290, the minimum seperation between two aircraft is 5nm within 2000ft. Not sure if the rule is different in Europe or not, but I am sure that it probably similar.
AA
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 181
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2002 12:50 am
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Re: Minimum distance?

Postby Nexus » Sat Aug 04, 2007 8:04 pm

I know that in the US above FL290, the minimum seperation between two aircraft is 5nm within 2000ft. Not sure if the rule is different in Europe or not, but I am sure that it probably similar.


Aren't the yanks deploying RVSM throughout their country  (like Europe)?
If you, then I'm afraid you're not updated  :D
What you described used to the old separation minimas, but RVSM (Reduced Vertical Separation Minima)has shrunk it to just 1000ft between east and westbounds.

I'm not american so I'm not 100% sure, but I do know that US has some RVSM airspace, and probably their whole horisontal UTA coverage  :-?
Nexus
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3240
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 4:18 pm

Re: Minimum distance?

Postby MWISimmer » Tue Aug 07, 2007 4:56 pm

I was under the impression that Eastbound and Westbound flight levels are odd and even numbers.. or is that just the North Atlantic track?
MWISimmer
 

Re: Minimum distance?

Postby C » Tue Aug 07, 2007 5:50 pm

I was under the impression that Eastbound and Westbound flight levels are odd and even numbers.. or is that just the North Atlantic track?


Semi circular rule in the upper airspace. Basically odd FLs from 000 to 179deg mag track (eg FL250), even FLs 180 to 359deg (eg FL260).

The Quadrantal rule is used in the lower airspace (000-089: odd (eg FL50); 090-179: odd+500' (eg FL55); 180-269: even (eg FL60); 270-359: even+500' (eg FL65)) :)
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Minimum distance?

Postby Jakemaster » Tue Aug 07, 2007 6:29 pm

A bit like the old joke "A guy and his wife are flying off on holiday when there is a huge scream from most of the people in the plane, the husband turns to the wife and says 'I think we just had a near miss but I'm not sure as another plane got between us!'" ;D


Huh?  I don't get it....

If I made the rules for flying:  All planes must stay far enough apart not to hit each other.  There, everyone's happy! ;D ;D ;D
Jakemaster
 

Re: Minimum distance?

Postby MWISimmer » Tue Aug 07, 2007 6:43 pm

Semi circular rule in the upper airspace. Basically odd FLs from 000 to 179deg mag track (eg FL250), even FLs 180 to 359deg (eg FL260).

The Quadrantal rule is used in the lower airspace (000-089: odd (eg FL50); 090-179: odd+500' (eg FL55); 180-269: even (eg FL60); 270-359: even+500' (eg FL65)) :)


So I was half right then..
Last edited by MWISimmer on Tue Aug 07, 2007 6:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
MWISimmer
 

Re: Minimum distance?

Postby Nick N » Tue Aug 07, 2007 6:44 pm

George Carlin

Jammin' in New York, 1992

Here's one they just made up: "near miss". When two planes almost collide, they call it a near miss.

Dont let them fool you, It's a near hit.


A collision is a near miss.
Last edited by Nick N on Tue Aug 07, 2007 6:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nick N
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 2:12 pm

Re: Minimum distance?

Postby AA » Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:47 pm

[quote]
Aren't the yanks deploying RVSM throughout their country
AA
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 181
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2002 12:50 am
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma


Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 416 guests