You are serious right?!!!!Thats something i haven't seen before.
Not surprised. The travel and hospitality biz in general have been offering "separate but equal" service to that crowd for years... it's not insulting to them, I guess, because if a same-sex couple spend a fortune to go somewhere and want to hold hands on the beach without a posse running them out of town, they'd prefer to know beforehand that the locale is "gay-friendly".
And it's a sound business decision: despite the recent trend in gays starting families, most don't have kids, so that means more disposable income.
It's also not so exclusive as you might think: for example, a few years ago I found a really nice little hotel in Miami where I could stay with my dog for a couple of nights... my search was for a dog-friendly place, but it also turned out it was a gay-friendly place (as in on official gay-friendly listings).
But it didn't seem particularly "gay" to me, although I guess some of the other guests may have been of that persuasion.
I didn't care either way- the place was nice, not too expensive, the proprietress (and her dog) were very friendly and helpful...it was excellent. Unlike the chain hotel at our first stop, which claimed online to be dog-friendly, did not reply either way to my online query about the dog, yet gave me a bunch of static when I arrived with dog in tow. >:(
No flights to Alabama?
No flights to Alabama?
No flights to Alabama?
I'm pretty sure "gay" still means "carefree" in Alabama...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 361 guests