Another display-teams poll

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Another display-teams poll

Postby spitfire boy » Sun May 27, 2007 5:42 pm

Focusing on the Reds this time ;)
Image


[center]
User avatar
spitfire boy
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 4:46 pm
Location: Wherever you think I'm not

Re: Another display-teams poll

Postby C » Sun May 27, 2007 6:15 pm

As far as I can see, the Reds will continue with the Hawk T1 for the near and middle term future. As the T2/Mk128 enters service then I expect the T1 will not have any availability/attrition issues, and even when the T1 is withdrawn completely from the flying training system it may remain with 100Sqn and the Reds anyway.

The Eurofighter and F-35 would never be considered - they are too expensive and valuable as frontline assets. The main purpose of the Reds is to promote the RAF and sell BAE Systems products - mainly Hawks - the value of using any other airframe would be minimal.
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Another display-teams poll

Postby Craig. » Sun May 27, 2007 6:19 pm

while 9 typhoons in red would look and sound awesome I am in agreement with charlie. Plus the hawk is the perfect little display plane for it.
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Re: Another display-teams poll

Postby C » Sun May 27, 2007 6:39 pm

while 9 typhoons in red would look and sound awesome I am in agreement with charlie. Plus the hawk is the perfect little display plane for it.


...and even more importantly has two seats - perfect for carrying Blue Peter presenters/journos/VIPs etc... :)
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Another display-teams poll

Postby Tweek » Sun May 27, 2007 6:45 pm

Well there's supposed to be a Typhoon 9-ship flypast in London on the 16th June (Queen's flypast), so you may get a little 'what if?' there. ;)

Another point about using the Hawk (I suppose Charlie may have covered it with the BAE Systems comment) is that it's the only pure-British aircraft left in RAF service suitable for the job. That says something in itself, to be using a truely British aircraft to represent the RAF.

Thunderbirds - F-16 (American)
Blue Angels - F-18 (American)
Patrouille de France - Alpha Jet (French/German)
Frecce Tricolori - MB339 (Italian)
Russian Knights - Su-27 (Russian)
Swifts - MiG-29 (Russian)
Patrulla Aguila - C.101 Aviojet (Spanish)

See, they all do it! Of course there are obvious exceptions - Asas de Portugal, Turkish Stars, Royal Jordanian Falcons, Midnight Hawks, etc etc.
Last edited by Tweek on Sun May 27, 2007 6:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Tweek
 

Re: Another display-teams poll

Postby C » Sun May 27, 2007 6:50 pm


Another point about using the Hawk (I suppose Charlie may have covered it with the BAE Systems comment) is that it's the only pure-British aircraft left in RAF service suitable for the job. That says something in itself, to be using a truely British aircraft to represent the RAF.


Of course, a big maybe is that it's feasible that in a few years time the Reds may end up using whatever is used to replace the Tucano (if the Tincan's replacement ends up being a jet). :) And that almost certainly wont be British (Swiss-American/Brazilian/Swiss or hopefully Italian!)
Last edited by C on Sun May 27, 2007 6:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Another display-teams poll

Postby Hagar » Sun May 27, 2007 7:00 pm

The RAF display team has been part of the Central Flying School since 1964. The pilots were originally senior CFS flying instructors showing off the capabilities of the aircraft used for training RAF pilots on. Advanced training types are much cheaper to operate & more suitable than supersonic front-line fighters for this sort of work. The Hawk is ideal for the formation displays the Red Arrows are famous for. There is no reason to change it.

Short history of the Red Arrows
Last edited by Hagar on Sun May 27, 2007 7:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30864
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: Another display-teams poll

Postby F3Hadlow » Sun May 27, 2007 7:07 pm

Silly choices to be honest (only in my opinion of course). With the RAF already suffering from budget cuts there hardly likely to use a frontline fast jet in such large numbers, the costs would be extremely high. Why change from a proven formula (ie a jet trainer).
F3Hadlow
 

Re: Another display-teams poll

Postby Canuck. » Sun May 27, 2007 8:46 pm

As far as I can see, the Reds will continue with the Hawk T1 for the near and middle term future. As the T2/Mk128 enters service then I expect the T1 will not have any availability/attrition issues, and even when the T1 is withdrawn completely from the flying training system it may remain with 100Sqn and the Reds anyway.

The Eurofighter and F-35 would never be considered - they are too expensive and valuable as frontline assets. The main purpose of the Reds is to promote the RAF and sell BAE Systems products - mainly Hawks - the value of using any other airframe would be minimal.


they will probably be like the Snowbirds...the CAF replaced the CT-114 Tutor with the CT-155 Hawk in 2000...the Snowbirds are the only squadron using the Tutor...the reds will probably be like that!
Canuck.
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 770
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 12:49 am
Location: Tecumseh, On, Canada

Re: Another display-teams poll

Postby Jared » Sun May 27, 2007 10:13 pm

it wouldn't be the same if they switched ;)
User avatar
Jared
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 9976
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2003 11:18 am
Location: Uniontown, Ohio

Re: Another display-teams poll

Postby spitfire boy » Mon May 28, 2007 3:24 am

it wouldn't be the same if they switched ;)


I'll bet you people said that when the Red Arrows changed from Folland Gnats to Hawks! ;)

there hardly likely to use a frontline fast jet in such large numbers, the costs would be extremely high.


The Thunderbirds and Blue Angels use front-line jets - however, I'm not in agreement that that's a good thing - too much speed, not enough agility.
Last edited by spitfire boy on Mon May 28, 2007 3:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image


[center]
User avatar
spitfire boy
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 4:46 pm
Location: Wherever you think I'm not

Re: Another display-teams poll

Postby Hagar » Mon May 28, 2007 4:00 am

it wouldn't be the same if they switched ;)


I'll bet you people said that when the Red Arrows changed from Folland Gnats to Hawks! ;)

there hardly likely to use a frontline fast jet in such large numbers, the costs would be extremely high.


The Thunderbirds and Blue Angels use front-line jets - however, I'm not in agreement that that's a good thing - too much speed, not enough agility.
Last edited by Hagar on Mon May 28, 2007 4:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30864
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: Another display-teams poll

Postby F3Hadlow » Mon May 28, 2007 4:37 am


there hardly likely to use a frontline fast jet in such large numbers, the costs would be extremely high.


The Thunderbirds and Blue Angels use front-line jets - however, I'm not in agreement that that's a good thing - too much speed, not enough agility.
Last edited by F3Hadlow on Mon May 28, 2007 4:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
F3Hadlow
 

Re: Another display-teams poll

Postby spitfire boy » Mon May 28, 2007 4:39 am

it wouldn't be the same if they switched ;)


I'll bet you people said that when the Red Arrows changed from Folland Gnats to Hawks! ;)

there hardly likely to use a frontline fast jet in such large numbers, the costs would be extremely high.


The Thunderbirds and Blue Angels use front-line jets - however, I'm not in agreement that that's a good thing - too much speed, not enough agility.
Image


[center]
User avatar
spitfire boy
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 4:46 pm
Location: Wherever you think I'm not

Re: Another display-teams poll

Postby Tom... » Mon May 28, 2007 9:41 am


there hardly likely to use a frontline fast jet in such large numbers, the costs would be extremely high.


The Thunderbirds and Blue Angels use front-line jets - however, I'm not in agreement that that's a good thing - too much speed, not enough agility.  I just wanted to know what everybody else thought.


As Hagar right states, they fly a completely different display. Besides, the American air arms have a lot more money to play around with than the RAF, they can afford to operate expensive front line fighters in that manner.

But still they dont get that much of a choice in what they get, the frontline squadrons get all the new aircraft and the display teams get whats left
Image
User avatar
Tom...
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 354
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 5:29 pm
Location: Suffolk

Next

Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 526 guests