The Ugliest Aircraft!!

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Re: The Ugliest Aircraft!!

Postby Mushroom_Farmer » Tue Mar 13, 2007 4:21 pm

Just the sound of it, and the sound of that beast of a cannon firing, is enough  


You mean whooosh followed by faaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrt
Last edited by Mushroom_Farmer on Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

"We're just sitting here trying to put our PCjrs in a pile and burn them. And the damn things won't burn. That's the only thing IBM did right with it - they made i
User avatar
Mushroom_Farmer
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1633
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 11:54 pm
Location: Indiana, USA

Re: The Ugliest Aircraft!!

Postby TSC. » Tue Mar 13, 2007 5:38 pm

[quote] You mean whooosh followed by faaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrt
Image

'Only two things are infinite.......The Universe and Human stupidity........and I'm not too sure about the Universe' - Einstein
User avatar
TSC.
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4273
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 11:11 am
Location: Torquay, Devon, England.

Re: The Ugliest Aircraft!!

Postby Ravang » Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:44 pm

Any aircraft compared to a Spitfire is ugly 8-), but for the ugliest of the ugly it has to be Russian Transports. :PI have the right to free speech :D  
User avatar
Ravang
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:40 pm
Location: South Carolina, USA

Re: The Ugliest Aircraft!!

Postby Jakemaster » Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:39 am

The spitfire...










JUST KIDDING MARK! PUT AWAY THE MARMALADE!

No seriously, I can't pick just one ugly plane.  As others have said, all aircraft are beautiful.  Some are odd and not exactly sensually pleasing, but they are still planes.  I personally think that from certain angles almost any aircraft can be ugly (except the DC-3, it's beautiful no matter how you look at it), and I also tink that the A-380 is one of the ugliest out there now.
Jakemaster
 

Re: The Ugliest Aircraft!!

Postby expat » Wed Mar 14, 2007 7:17 am

A 10 Warthog

Matt


Grrrrrrrrroooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll


You'll learn to love the 'Hog if you've seen that sweet, sweet machine of death and destruction in action (Mmmmmmmm... GAU-8).

Just the sound of it, and the sound of that beast of a cannon firing, is enough  ;D



Bearing in mind I am over twice your age, I may have seen a thing or two more than your think  ;)

Matt
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....

Re: The Ugliest Aircraft!!

Postby ATI_7500 » Wed Mar 14, 2007 7:49 am

Spitfire, Lancaster, P-80, MiG-15/17, MiG-21F series, A-6,...


Just to name  a few...
ATI_7500
 

Re: The Ugliest Aircraft!!

Postby F3Hadlow » Thu Mar 15, 2007 6:33 pm

I have to go along with the X32 too.
F3Hadlow
 

Re: The Ugliest Aircraft!!

Postby TheletterR » Thu Mar 15, 2007 8:15 pm

I was reading about this in a book about airplanes, da da da da! The amazing 377SG 'Super Guppy' http://www.diseno-art.com/encyclopedia/machines/super_guppy.html
I DO CARE ABOUT BF2, ES MUY BUENO

ASK ME SOMETHING, I'LL TELL YOU MY OPINION

Picture from my trip to the beach this summer
Image
User avatar
TheletterR
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 4:06 pm
Location: Um, USA

Re: The Ugliest Aircraft!!

Postby Boomtown Rat » Thu Mar 15, 2007 8:30 pm

Image
User avatar
Boomtown Rat
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 9:30 pm
Location: Wellington, FL

Re: The Ugliest Aircraft!!

Postby Ivan » Sat Mar 17, 2007 9:24 am

PZL M-15 and Transavia Airtruk
Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and [url=http://an24.uw.hu/]An-24RV[/ur
Ivan
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5805
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 8:18 am
Location: The netherlands

Re: The Ugliest Aircraft!!

Postby expat » Sat Mar 17, 2007 7:43 pm

Spitfire, Lancaster, P-80, MiG-15/17, MiG-21F series, A-6,...


Just to name  a few...



Spitfire....................Are just trying it bate Ozzy?

Matt
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....

Re: The Ugliest Aircraft!!

Postby an-225 » Sun Mar 18, 2007 1:30 am

Well...personally, I agree with Hagar and Tweek. The Super Connies are the most beautiful propliners around ESPECIALLY the long nose (radar) types. I love the An-225 and the Il-76 too. If you happen to say any of these (eh, you can make fun of the Il-76) are ugly...I keeeell you.  :) So, ugliest aircraft...hmmm...the Spitfire for sure. Vickers Valiant. P-80. F-86 Sabre. MiG 15/17/19/21. YB-52. B-47. Lisunov Li-2. Tornado F3. P-47 Thunderbolt. F-15A/C (E and ACTIVE are alright though). F/A-18E Super Hornet (C is alright). F-100 Super Sabre. F-17. E-1 Tracer. E-3A Sentry (Later versions are alright though, if they don't use CFM engines). MD-11. DC-10 (KC-10 is alright). 737 (Wedgetail and C-40 are alright). 717. 767. 777. 787. Antonov's flying tank. Tu-22A. And the Spitfire.

There that should cover all.  ;)
an-225
 

Re: The Ugliest Aircraft!!

Postby Tweek » Sun Mar 18, 2007 5:39 am

So, ugliest aircraft...hmmm...the Spitfire for sure. Vickers Valiant. P-80. F-86 Sabre. MiG 15/17/19/21. YB-52. B-47. Lisunov Li-2. Tornado F3. P-47 Thunderbolt. F-15A/C (E and ACTIVE are alright though). F/A-18E Super Hornet (C is alright). F-100 Super Sabre. F-17. E-1 Tracer. E-3A Sentry (Later versions are alright though, if they don't use CFM engines). MD-11. DC-10 (KC-10 is alright). 737 (Wedgetail and C-40 are alright). 717. 767. 777. 787. Antonov's flying tank. Tu-22A. And the Spitfire.


What on earth is wrong with that lot?! :o
Tweek
 

Re: The Ugliest Aircraft!!

Postby an-225 » Sun Mar 18, 2007 6:31 am

Tweek, this means war. You did not accept my peace offering (not listing the SEPECAT Jaguar). Just joking!  ;D

Reasons as follows for not liking aircraft that I listed:

Spitfire: To annoy Ozzy.
Vickers Valiant: Not streamlined.
P-80: Not streamlined.
F-86 Sabre: Not streamlined. Also has a hole in its nose. Why don't we just call it the F-86 Bundt Cake?
MiG-15/17/19/21: Same as F-86 Bundt Cake.
YB-52: Has a hideous bubble canopy. XB-52 is alright however.
B-47: See YB-52.
Lisunov Li-2: Piece of crap copy of the DC-3!!! There is only one DC-3. That is the DC-3.
Tornado F3: Streamlined. However its too streamlined. I prefer the bulky GR.4.
P-47: What...the...you are asking why this one is ugly? Lets rename the B-47 (jet) to B-47 II and this one to FB-47. The FB stands for flying bathtub.
F-15A/C: Well...its streamlined. The overall shape appeals to me. However the A & C are too small, so instead I opt for the E or ACTIVE.
F/A-18E Super Hornet: Eh, I hate those box intakes. I love the C's round ones.
F-100 Super Sabre: See F-86 Bundt Cake.
F-17: O...K...lots of things are wrong with this one. The shape is too radical compared to our present F-18's.
E-1 Tracer: Basically an E-2C Hawkeye. Which I like. However, the radar radome is WOAH! BIG!
E-3A Sentry: Eh, I like most current AWAC aircraft. However the flir and radar on the sides of the airframe spoil its looks and it doesn't look as streamlined as, say an E-3C Sentry.
MD-11: Its a tube with wings. 'Nuff said.
DC-10: This has a bit more character than the MD-11. It is not all automated. However it is still a tube with wings. KC-10 simply looks better because of the boom...and the Gunship Grey scheme.
737: Tube with wings. Wedgetail and C-40 are accepted due to radar equipment.
717: It is a lifeless, non-streamlined tube with wings.
767: Say good bye to the "airplanes with character" era.
777: See 767.
787: See 777 and 767.
Antonov Flying Tank: It is a tank that glides.
Tu-22A: Eh, I prefer the later version. The one with the name that escapes me. The Tu-22A just looks strange with two engines on the tail.

Well. There you go. The master list of reasons why these planes look ugly.
an-225
 

Re: The Ugliest Aircraft!!

Postby Tweek » Sun Mar 18, 2007 7:16 am

Ooh, detailed answer. ;D

Yes I agree with some of them, mainly the 'tubes with wings'! But I'm not sure how an Li-2 can be ugly, and a DC-3 can be not, seeing as they look exactly the same!

I happen to like the Valiant, F-86, MiG-15/17/21, Tornado (F3 and GR4), F-15, F/A-18 (yes, I prefer the A/C to the E), F-100, E-3A (in fact I think the E-3A looks better than the E-3D, nice smoky engines too!)... and that's probably about it.

The Tu-22A is the 'Blinder' and the Tu-22M3 is the 'Backfire'. The Tu-22M3 is one awesome aircraft. 8-)
Tweek
 

PreviousNext

Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 513 guests