Boeing 767-400

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Boeing 767-400

Postby rich747 » Wed May 03, 2006 12:58 pm

What exactly was the market that Continental and Delta needed this plane for? I know it is always described as their own "niche" market but what exactly does this plane have that other 767's cannot provide. And also why CO and DL not anyone else?

Cheers Rich
Where's the challenge in landing with wheels?
User avatar
rich747
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 213
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 3:07 pm
Location: UK, Birmingham

Re: Boeing 767-400

Postby Craig. » Wed May 03, 2006 1:03 pm

I might be wrong but I believe it was for trans-continental and US-Europe routes.
extra passengers and cargo was the reason. IIRC
Last edited by Craig. on Wed May 03, 2006 1:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Re: Boeing 767-400

Postby lilley91 » Wed May 03, 2006 4:15 pm

but that seems a little over the top to get a new type of 767, why not just use 777s instead, or was there a reason like fuel consuption or something? ??? that has me confused now

cheers
james
lilley91
 

Re: Boeing 767-400

Postby Craig. » Wed May 03, 2006 4:17 pm

because the 777 was too big for the shorter long haul flights and too expensive.
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Re: Boeing 767-400

Postby lilley91 » Wed May 03, 2006 4:22 pm

is there that much of a difference between the 777 and the 764?
doesnt look like that big i difference, but then again a
small increase in size = a huge increase in cost though
just seems like an awful long way to go to make a new version when there are 777s or even A330s and A340s to use.
lilley91
 

Re: Boeing 767-400

Postby Craig. » Wed May 03, 2006 4:25 pm

you have to also factor in, the technological differances. The 777 is far more advanced than the 767. Also the 777 in its smallest varient carrys 60 more passengers in 3 classes and I believe over 100 more in a single class config.
Last edited by Craig. on Wed May 03, 2006 4:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Re: Boeing 767-400

Postby lilley91 » Wed May 03, 2006 4:30 pm

well if boeing were making a new model the -400, wouldnt they put in the higher technology of the 777?
lilley91
 

Re: Boeing 767-400

Postby Craig. » Wed May 03, 2006 4:32 pm

the 400 model is old. Its not a new design.
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Re: Boeing 767-400

Postby lilley91 » Wed May 03, 2006 4:35 pm

ah, thats where im wrong, o thought the CO and DL had it made for them because the 763 was not of the right capacity, i thought it was a recent thing.  Blonde moment, dont worry about them, you'll get used to them eventually

james
lilley91
 

Re: Boeing 767-400

Postby Nexus » Wed May 03, 2006 4:55 pm

764 has 777 cockpit layout, but lacks the software technology of the triple 7.
However, the wing tips has been given a  fresh improvements, sporting the same drag reducing wing tips of the 777's.

But yes...it's apparantly in its own "Niche "market  ;D
Nexus
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3240
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 4:18 pm

Re: Boeing 767-400

Postby rich747 » Thu May 04, 2006 1:51 pm

Thanks for that everybody, very interesting. Stingy people really aren't they are DL and CO? ;D only joking happy days.


Rich
Where's the challenge in landing with wheels?
User avatar
rich747
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 213
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 3:07 pm
Location: UK, Birmingham

Re: Boeing 767-400

Postby RitterKreuz » Mon May 08, 2006 1:01 pm

another thing to consider is pilot training... 757 and 767 type ratings are one in the same i believe... this way all their 757 guys could transfer to 767 flying without additional type training. this is another $$$ saver for the company.

thats one reason that southwest is doing so well is because the cost of pilot training is way down. you HAVE to have a 737 type to hire on at southwest. and since their whole fleet is one 737 type or another their training costs are about as cheap as possible. whereas with delta and American and other Legacy air carriers who operate several different types have to spend money on pilot training... lots of money.

given the differences between the 767 and the 777 i think it would be wise to buy the 76 and save the training costs. IMHO
RitterKreuz
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1215
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 3:26 am
Location: Texas

Re: Boeing 767-400

Postby Craig. » Mon May 08, 2006 1:06 pm

Both companies operated the 767 before buying the 400 series anyway. ;)
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham


Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 486 guests