Boeing goes back to the future...

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Boeing goes back to the future...

Postby C » Mon Aug 29, 2005 7:54 am

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/photos/photo.asp?PhotoID=71749

I'm sure I've seen this nose somewhere before...

...anyone guess where...
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Boeing goes back to the future...

Postby eno » Mon Aug 29, 2005 8:10 am

That's rather like the late lamented Concorde.
[align=center][img]http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/imaginsigeno.jpg[/img][/align]
User avatar
eno
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 6708
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2004 12:30 pm
Location: Derbyshire UK

Re: Boeing goes back to the future...

Postby C » Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:14 am

If you continue the nose curvature down to a point, it appears that Messrs Boeing have admitted that the Hatfield team got the nose aerodynamics right nearly 60 years ago with the Comet(ok, windows weren't their forte though...). :)
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Boeing goes back to the future...

Postby Craig. » Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:24 am

Personally i cant wait for the 7E7 sorry 787 ::) to be built, this things going to be an amazing plane.
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Re: Boeing goes back to the future...

Postby Felix/FFDS » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:05 am

If you continue the nose curvature down to a point, it appears that Messrs Boeing have admitted that the Hatfield team got the nose aerodynamics right nearly 60 years ago with the Comet(ok, windows weren't their forte though...). :)



I think it was a wee bit more than coincidence that the front section of the Caravelle was a straight graft from the Comet 1?
Felix/FFDS
User avatar
Felix/FFDS
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 16776435
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 9:42 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: Boeing goes back to the future...

Postby C » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:19 am



I think it was a wee bit more than coincidence that the front section of the Caravelle was a straight graft from the Comet 1?



Completely uncoincidental I think...
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Boeing goes back to the future...

Postby Felix/FFDS » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:32 am


Completely uncoincidental I think...



More than coincidence:

"Two months later the SNCASE received official notification that its design had been accepted. On July 6 1953 the SGACC ordered two prototypes and two static airframes for fatigue testing. Sud's design licensed several fuselage features from De Havilland, a company Sud had dealings with for several earlier designs. The nose area and cockpit layout were both taken directly from the Comet, while the rest of the plane was locally designed."
Felix/FFDS
User avatar
Felix/FFDS
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 16776435
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 9:42 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: Boeing goes back to the future...

Postby C » Mon Aug 29, 2005 11:43 am

Not suprising really - wasn't it Sud who manufactured the Vampire and Venom under license in France? It makes sense - why redesign the most complex part of an aircraft if you don't need to... :)
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Boeing goes back to the future...

Postby Mynameisnemo » Mon Aug 29, 2005 3:39 pm

one wonders what will happen when they reach 797?
will they go on to 808 or somthin like that or some other random numbers?
Mynameisnemo
 

Re: Boeing goes back to the future...

Postby Ivan » Tue Aug 30, 2005 2:51 am

one wonders what will happen when they reach 797?
will they go on to 808 or somthin like that or some other random numbers?

x0x (anything with a zero in the middle) is worldwide registered by Peugeot (that was after the Boeing )707. No-one can use these numbers (Porsche tried... and the result is the 911, which actually was '901' first)
Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and [url=http://an24.uw.hu/]An-24RV[/ur
Ivan
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5805
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 8:18 am
Location: The netherlands

Re: Boeing goes back to the future...

Postby Felix/FFDS » Tue Aug 30, 2005 10:16 am

x0x (anything with a zero in the middle) is worldwide registered by Peugeot (that was after the Boeing )707. No-one can use these numbers (Porsche tried... and the result is the 911, which actually was '901' first)



Also the Mercedes C-101 show car, had to become the C-111....
Felix/FFDS
User avatar
Felix/FFDS
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 16776435
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 9:42 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: Boeing goes back to the future...

Postby MarcoAviator » Tue Aug 30, 2005 10:22 am

So it's gonna have to skip and become 818 ...
Last edited by MarcoAviator on Tue Aug 30, 2005 10:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Pilot Lounge (my aviation forum)
Marco's Hangar (my blog)
User avatar
MarcoAviator
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 3:09 pm
Location: NJ, USA

Re: Boeing goes back to the future...

Postby Hagar » Tue Aug 30, 2005 10:41 am

So it's gonna have to skip and become 818 ...

Unless someone beats them to it & registers x1x numbers first. The whole thing is becoming ridiculous. IMHO
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30864
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: Boeing goes back to the future...

Postby Moach » Tue Aug 30, 2005 10:32 pm

i always wanted to ask...

does anyone know why boeing names their aircraft like that?
why the 7's? is it a supersticious thing or is there a technical reason?

:P just wondering...
If nature wanted a man to fly - It would have given him more money
User avatar
Moach
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2002 3:22 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC


Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 461 guests