The "A310"

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

The "A310"

Postby Jimbo » Mon Jul 25, 2005 8:35 am

Now this is aircraft seems unsual to me.

1. I dont see alot of them around
2. they have a great russsian appearance.

Does anyone know alot about this aircraft, its uses, when it was built etc.

I have always wondered!

Thanks for the info!

Jimbo
..Jimbo's Tours, MORE info in the MULTIPLAYER SECTION
User avatar
Jimbo
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2387
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:09 am
Location: HOMETOWN: Sheffield UK, Living: Perth, AU

Re: The "A310"

Postby Felix/FFDS » Mon Jul 25, 2005 9:28 am

If I recall correctly, the first series of Airbuses were the A300/A310 series - waay back in the '70s/'80s.  

At that, the overall shape of the Airbus(es) follows the shapes of the Dassault Mercure (largely unssuccessful due to short range philosophy tankage).

You probably don't see many of them anymore because they're older planes, and heading to secondary lines/carriers.
Felix/FFDS
User avatar
Felix/FFDS
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 16776435
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2001 9:42 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: The "A310"

Postby jrpilot » Mon Jul 25, 2005 9:41 am

For the North America, I know FEDEX flys them and AIR TRANSAT.
jrpilot
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2178
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 3:04 pm

Re: The "A310"

Postby Nexus » Mon Jul 25, 2005 9:59 am

The A310 was launched in 1982 as a direct derative to the longer A300 series.
One of the differences compared to the A300 is clean outer wing areas (without vortex generators) which results in a slightly higher lift coefficient.
The A310 was Airbus answer to the upcoming market of 200 seaters for the short haul/medium range market.

Yes the A310 is used to cross the atlantic, but that's the A310-300 which is the "long range" version with drag reducing wingtips (retrofitted on all 310's) and a tail plane trimtank to accomodate more fuel.

On the paper, the A310 was supposed to come in 3 different versions
-100 =short haul
-200= medium haul
-300= long range
Though the -100 series was dropped in favor of different weight versions for the A310-200.

It shares many traits with the A300, which means no FBW and conventional yoke and "strings" to rudder and other control surfaces  :)
Nexus
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3240
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 4:18 pm

Re: The "A310"

Postby Jimbo » Mon Jul 25, 2005 10:29 am

Thanks for the Advice guys!

I never knew any of that!
I think it looks a great aircraft

Jimbo
..Jimbo's Tours, MORE info in the MULTIPLAYER SECTION
User avatar
Jimbo
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2387
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:09 am
Location: HOMETOWN: Sheffield UK, Living: Perth, AU

Re: The "A310"

Postby C » Mon Jul 25, 2005 11:58 am

At that, the overall shape of the Airbus(es) follows the shapes of the Dassault Mercure (largely unssuccessful due to short range philosophy tankage).


Quite similar to several undeveloped HS designs of the 1960s too. Have to say its had quite a good innings considering the later Airbus' and Boeing competition, and now enjoying a second life with several airforces as a tanker and transport aircraft
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: The "A310"

Postby Mr. Bones » Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:40 pm

The Belgian Air Force is still using them. I think we have two of them. Used for VIP's, Ministers, Royal Family,...
Raw power...the J-58.
Image

My Anet collection.
Mr. Bones
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3969
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2002 10:32 am


Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 607 guests