Better in real life than in fs?

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

Better in real life than in fs?

Postby beefhole » Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:56 pm

I was never a fan of flying small, prop aircraft in fs for two reasons-one, my joystick sucked and it made controlling it a bitch (that's been resolved now). Two, I was always more into commercial aviation.

Anyways, with my solo coming up, I figured I'd load up a flight at my airport (Wings-in the game it's N67, in real life it's KLOM) and do a curcuit or two.

And man did I suck.

It was terrible, I was all over the place. The very first time I flew a traffic pattern in real life I nailed it, and I've probably flown like 30 since. And you mean I can't get one good pattern in on fs?

I was wondering if any other RL pilots here had noticed that they flew better in real life than on the sim.
Last edited by beefhole on Sat Feb 19, 2005 10:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
beefhole
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3804
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 8:57 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Better in real life than in fs?

Postby C » Sat Feb 19, 2005 3:15 pm

Yep - real life aircraft are easier to trim, and you can fly visual attidudes much better with greater peripheral vision, and you get proper feedback from the controls...

Charlie
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Better in real life than in fs?

Postby ozzy72 » Sat Feb 19, 2005 4:20 pm

True Charlie, but the insurance is much cheaper on FS, and the way you drive Harvards that HAS to be a good thing ;) ;D
Image
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
User avatar
ozzy72
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 33284
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 4:45 am
Location: Madsville

Re: Better in real life than in fs?

Postby C » Sat Feb 19, 2005 5:02 pm

True Charlie, but the insurance is much cheaper on FS, and the way you drive Harvards that HAS to be a good thing ;) ;D


That was only taxing though...
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Better in real life than in fs?

Postby chomp_rock » Sat Feb 19, 2005 6:07 pm

YES, flying is MUCH easier in real life. Especially aerobatics and helos! Here are some of the advantages:

Being able to look around
Peripheral vision
Being able to feel movements
Things are much easier to see
Real controls, no mouse clicking or keyboards to slow stuff down
better instruments (more detailed and easier to see)

There are more but I'm short of time.
AMD Athlon 64 3700+
GeForce FX5200 256Mb
1GB DDR400 DC
Seagate 500Gb SATA-300 HDD
Windows XP Professional X64 Edition


That's right, I'm now using an AMD! I decided to give them another try and they
User avatar
chomp_rock
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2411
Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2002 2:23 pm

Re: Better in real life than in fs?

Postby C » Sat Feb 19, 2005 6:11 pm

...but then you add fuel management, emergencies, birds, weather, birds, getting lost, air sickness, weather, examiners and more birds...

... then you wish you were back in front of the PC with Flight Sim again!

Oh, and I forgot - ATC... ;)

Charlie
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Better in real life than in fs?

Postby chomp_rock » Sat Feb 19, 2005 9:27 pm

...but then you add fuel management, emergencies, birds, weather, birds, getting lost, air sickness, weather, examiners and more birds...

... then you wish you were back in front of the PC with Flight Sim again!


I sure as hell don't!

Plus I'm quite fond of the ATC, they've helped me too many times for me not to be!
AMD Athlon 64 3700+
GeForce FX5200 256Mb
1GB DDR400 DC
Seagate 500Gb SATA-300 HDD
Windows XP Professional X64 Edition


That's right, I'm now using an AMD! I decided to give them another try and they
User avatar
chomp_rock
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2411
Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2002 2:23 pm

Re: Better in real life than in fs?

Postby Saratoga » Sat Feb 19, 2005 9:34 pm

Yup I fly a great deal better in reality than in the sim. All the reasons above are very true, strange though, throw in adjusting radios, talking to ATC, flying obviously, flaps, gear, it should be harder in reality. But for me, it seems much easier to fly in the real world.

(Then again, in reality there are passengers in the back who probably have no problem breaking my nose if I screw up)
Pilot for a major US airline certified in the: EMB-120, CRJ, 727, 737, 757, 767, and A-320 and military, T-38, C-130, C-141, and C-5 along with misc. other small airplanes. Any questions, I'm here for you.
User avatar
Saratoga
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 571
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Dallas-Ft. Worth Intl. (KDFW)

Re: Better in real life than in fs?

Postby Rocket_Bird » Sat Feb 19, 2005 10:23 pm

i think the thing about real life in comparison of the sim is the complications.
Last edited by Rocket_Bird on Sat Feb 19, 2005 10:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers,
RB

Image
User avatar
Rocket_Bird
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1222
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Better in real life than in fs?

Postby beefhole » Sat Feb 19, 2005 10:33 pm

Good to see I'm not the only one... ;D

And rocket, just out of interest, if you really wanted to, couldn't you move out to one of the three gazillion smaller airports around big cities? I know I personally wouldn't enjoy operating a 172 in class B.
User avatar
beefhole
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3804
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 8:57 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Better in real life than in fs?

Postby Rocket_Bird » Sat Feb 19, 2005 10:55 pm

I could, but i need money to move out too  ;D

It made my training kinda slow in certain areas, but its a good learning experience to operate in a busy airport.  Dodging heavies, avoiding jet blasts, talking to ATC whose always yabbing away, tuning so many different frequencies,argh hehe
Cheers,
RB

Image
User avatar
Rocket_Bird
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1222
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Better in real life than in fs?

Postby Mobius » Sat Feb 19, 2005 11:50 pm

Something I have noticed is that if I take a 172 up in FS for a quick jaunt around my home airport (C29) in Wisconisn, it's cool for a little while, but then I get kind of bored, but when I fly for real, I could stay up there for ever, if it weren't so expensive :P.  But flying for real is alot easier, especially landing, you can really feel your speed and the controls and everything and flaring a foot above the ground and slowly letting it settle is alot easier for real because you can see so much more.
Image
User avatar
Mobius
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3653
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 10:44 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Re: Better in real life than in fs?

Postby Saratoga » Sun Feb 20, 2005 12:05 am

Yes, the feeling is great of real flying.

I am with Mobius. Flying a 172 around in FS gets old fast. The municipal airport I fly out of sits right on the line (literally it bisects the airport) of the Class-B airspace around Dallas, Texas. So our takeoff procedures either way involve a quick turn to the east before climbing above 4,000 feet. In FS, it's no big deal, I can fly over Dallas VFR with my radios off and ATC is like "whateva." And I miss the controller in the tower at my airport, he is a nice guy lets us do a lot of fun stuff and throws a joke in occasionally. Big change of pace to finish an airline flight with those serious busy controllers at DFW then come home and be laid back.

Just, FS needs more depth. More real world feel, not the perfect enhanced robot feel it has right now. But it's a sim, what are we to ask of it? It's pretty good for the technology available. And, if all else fails, rent a 172. Nothing is as beautiful as sunrise in an airplane.
Pilot for a major US airline certified in the: EMB-120, CRJ, 727, 737, 757, 767, and A-320 and military, T-38, C-130, C-141, and C-5 along with misc. other small airplanes. Any questions, I'm here for you.
User avatar
Saratoga
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 571
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Dallas-Ft. Worth Intl. (KDFW)

Re: Better in real life than in fs?

Postby beefhole » Sun Feb 20, 2005 12:40 am

I'll tell ya one thing, ATC and other pilots sure don't sound, or talk, like they do in fs. It took me a long time to learn that its ok to shorten my calls, and drop the "-er" on "niner". My CFI told me "just talk to them like they're human beings-they're not some perfect robot entity", and I remember replying "heh, in fs they are!" ;D
User avatar
beefhole
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3804
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 8:57 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Better in real life than in fs?

Postby Saratoga » Sun Feb 20, 2005 12:47 am

lol beautiful beef. Ya it didn't take me long to figure out that controllers who read you you're taxi clearance were perfectly satisfied if you replied with "taxi 35, 3 tango bravo". Fair enough. But no, the sim it would be, "Taxi to and hold short of runway 35 using taxiway Charlie, Delta, Tango 1, Tango 3, Delta, Foxtrot, Mooney November five five three tango bravo." ::)
Pilot for a major US airline certified in the: EMB-120, CRJ, 727, 737, 757, 767, and A-320 and military, T-38, C-130, C-141, and C-5 along with misc. other small airplanes. Any questions, I'm here for you.
User avatar
Saratoga
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 571
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: Dallas-Ft. Worth Intl. (KDFW)

Next

Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 316 guests