KLAX In Trouble

Real aviation things here. News, items of interest, information, questions, etc!

KLAX In Trouble

Postby Hai Perso Coyone? » Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:02 am

uh.....dont know wht to say :-/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perimeter and air patrols are being beefed up at Los Angeles International as defense against possible shoulder-fired missile attacks on commercial aircraft, a top security official said.

Security officials are undergoing training specific for that threat, and additional helicopter patrols are being deployed, John Miller, head of the Los Angeles Police Department's counterterrorism bureau, told Airports Friday. While air patrols would not be able to counter a launched missile strike, they could give officials an important vantage point over the adjacent waterfront.

And, Miller added, if an attack were launched several miles away, an air patrol could trace the contrails back to the assailants.

"This is something terrorists are already trying," Miller said.

Miller noted that shoulder-fired missiles have been used against commercial flights in recent years, most recently against a cargo plane at Baghdad International. About 20,000 shoulder-fired missiles are on the black market, and no one knows how many could have been smuggled into the U.S., he said.

Lawmakers on Capitol Hill recognize the threat and included a provision in the intelligence reform bill to press the President to use diplomacy to limit proliferation. They also called on FAA to expedite airworthiness certification for aircraft defense systems. President Bush signed the bill into law last week.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
kinda scary,
ashar
User avatar
Hai Perso Coyone?
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:31 pm
Location: Rome, Italy

Re: KLAX In Trouble

Postby Craig. » Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:19 am

I find it more scarey that they think its best to just catch these guys rather than find ways to stop them altogether. Lets face it, they dont care what happens to them after they have completed their task, i would guess if they thought they would be caught then they would just kill themselves anyway.
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Re: KLAX In Trouble

Postby beefhole » Fri Jan 07, 2005 3:16 pm

They HAVE been stopping them altogether-why do you think there haven't been any major terroritst attacks on US soil since 9/11?  Because, every day, things we never hear about occur over sees-and even here occasionally. A news story about SEALs who sunk a ship full of weapons grade uranium (I think it's uranium-point is it's dangerous) was leaked to someone, and Discovery made a documentary on it.  It is quite clear there are many more ops of this sort going on daily.  Sometimes, things fall through the cracks. One of the biggest ocncerns are weapons that were here before we beefed up security. Sure hope LAX is safe, my thoughts are it'll be fine, everything else has been a scare.
User avatar
beefhole
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3804
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 8:57 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: KLAX In Trouble

Postby jrpilot » Fri Jan 07, 2005 3:30 pm

A little off topic but terroist are horrible....but sometimes if you give the media a inch they will sttetch it to a mile...for instance that uranium boat BEEFHOLE was talking about
jrpilot
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2178
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 3:04 pm

Re: KLAX In Trouble

Postby Craig. » Fri Jan 07, 2005 3:47 pm

Beefhole, the simple fact is, there hasnt been anything major because no-one has tried. US airport security still has many holes, as demonstrated by the people riding a boat upto JFK and wandering the taxiways for quite a while, it was purely innocent in this case but had they been terrorists then you can imagine what could have happend. The same goes for the guy who left weapon like objects in the toilets of various southwest aircraft. The stories of people accidentally getting the banned objects onto planes. As for the stuff you dont hear about, i can assure you i have a very good idea whats going on, and i have heard many stories from my dad and cousin who both served/serve in the military that will never make it to the press. The US needs to stop trying to tell various international airports how to run security and perhaps ask those with much better experiance what they can do to improve US airport safety. EL AL is known to have the toughest security in the world for airports they need to follow their example, here in the UK we have been very strict on security for a long time. The US after 9/11 made some great strides in terminal security, but then they screwed it up big time by bringing in the TSA. Now they are giving airports the option of private companies again under the supervision of the government, this should help alot. As for the LAX problem, CCTV along the problem area with 24 hour surveilance, that will allow them to spot suspcious individuals, they can then send the airpatrol to the location to keep watch while ground police come to the area.
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Re: KLAX In Trouble

Postby Ivan » Fri Jan 07, 2005 6:18 pm

uh.....dont know wht to say :-/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perimeter and air patrols are being beefed up at Los Angeles International as defense against possible shoulder-fired missile attacks on commercial aircraft, a top security official said.

Security officials are undergoing training specific for that threat, and additional helicopter patrols are being deployed, John Miller, head of the Los Angeles Police Department's counterterrorism bureau, told Airports Friday. While air patrols would not be able to counter a launched missile strike, they could give officials an important vantage point over the adjacent waterfront.

And, Miller added, if an attack were launched several miles away, an air patrol could trace the contrails back to the assailants.

"This is something terrorists are already trying," Miller said.

Miller noted that shoulder-fired missiles have been used against commercial flights in recent years, most recently against a cargo plane at Baghdad International. About 20,000 shoulder-fired missiles are on the black market, and no one knows how many could have been smuggled into the U.S., he said.

Lawmakers on Capitol Hill recognize the threat and included a provision in the intelligence reform bill to press the President to use diplomacy to limit proliferation. They also called on FAA to expedite airworthiness certification for aircraft defense systems. President Bush signed the bill into law last week.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
kinda scary,
ashar

air patrols? name me a helicopter that stands a chance against an modern (Igla-2 and the other new russian MANPAD toy) IR seeker warhead
Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and [url=http://an24.uw.hu/]An-24RV[/ur
Ivan
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5805
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 8:18 am
Location: The netherlands

Re: KLAX In Trouble

Postby beefhole » Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:27 pm

Beefhole, the simple fact is, there hasnt been anything major because no-one has tried. US airport security still has many holes, as demonstrated by the people riding a boat upto JFK and wandering the taxiways for quite a while, it was purely innocent in this case but had they been terrorists then you can imagine what could have happend. The same goes for the guy who left weapon like objects in the toilets of various southwest aircraft. The stories of people accidentally getting the banned objects onto planes. As for the stuff you dont hear about, i can assure you i have a very good idea whats going on, and i have heard many stories from my dad and cousin who both served/serve in the military that will never make it to the press. The US needs to stop trying to tell various international airports how to run security and perhaps ask those with much better experiance what they can do to improve US airport safety. EL AL is known to have the toughest security in the world for airports they need to follow their example, here in the UK we have been very strict on security for a long time. The US after 9/11 made some great strides in terminal security, but then they screwed it up big time by bringing in the TSA. Now they are giving airports the option of private companies again under the supervision of the government, this should help alot. As for the LAX problem, CCTV along the problem area with 24 hour surveilance, that will allow them to spot suspcious individuals, they can then send the airpatrol to the location to keep watch while ground police come to the area.

Damn dude, we can't cover everything... all I know is everything has been a scare up tot this point and anything that is truly, truly incredibly serious will be dealt with. Done.
User avatar
beefhole
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3804
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 8:57 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: KLAX In Trouble

Postby Craig. » Sat Jan 08, 2005 4:50 am

I know that its impossible to cover everything, and i agree that its been a scare upto this point. But what i am trying to say is, if your going to scare the public with this sort of information, you have to do more than say, "we'll catch them asap"
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Re: KLAX In Trouble

Postby Hagar » Sat Jan 08, 2005 5:07 am

I think it should be obvious to anyone with a little sense that an airliner is highly vulnerable to a modern heat seeking missile fired from a hand-held launcher. It makes an ideal target & the missile could be fired from miles around every airport in any country in the world. How can you possibly cover every single one?

I've seen plenty of ideal spots around Heathrow & Gatwick & I'm sure both the terrorists & security services are well aware of this. Heck, airliners fly over here regularly, well within range of a missile & the nearest big airport (Gatwick) is over 30 miles away. I could fire a missile from my back garden & be miles away before anyone found out where it came from. I realised this years ago so I can't think what all this latest paranoia is about.

I'm all for security & vigilance but being a photographer myself I can just see some innocent cameraman with a long zoom lens being mistaken for a terrorist & possibly shot for taking photos of an aircraft. I think this is just another example of overkill (pun not intended) to fool the public that something is being done.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30864
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: KLAX In Trouble

Postby chomp_rock » Sat Jan 08, 2005 10:37 am

I'm all for security & vigilance but being a photographer myself I can just see some innocent cameraman with a long zoom lens being mistaken for a terrorist & possibly shot for taking photos of an aircraft. I think this is just another example of overkill (pun not intended) to fool the public that something is being done.


I know what you're talking about, I have been rudely dismissed from international airports many times because I'm taking pictures with my 600mm lens which is usually on a tripod...
AMD Athlon 64 3700+
GeForce FX5200 256Mb
1GB DDR400 DC
Seagate 500Gb SATA-300 HDD
Windows XP Professional X64 Edition


That's right, I'm now using an AMD! I decided to give them another try and they
User avatar
chomp_rock
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2411
Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2002 2:23 pm

Re: KLAX In Trouble

Postby Hai Perso Coyone? » Sat Jan 08, 2005 5:49 pm

heat seeking missiles, that is even scarier, :o
User avatar
Hai Perso Coyone?
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:31 pm
Location: Rome, Italy

Re: KLAX In Trouble

Postby Hagar » Sat Jan 08, 2005 6:19 pm

heat seeking missiles, that is even scarier, :o

I have no wish to scare you but this is the most obvious method. They're not likely to use blunderbusses. It's been done successfully before on several occasions, some long before 9/11. In reality the terrorists have have achieved the desired result without doing anything or putting themselves at risk. They might be fanatical but they're not stupid. If you wanted to attempt to bring down down an airliner would you position yourself anywhere near a heavily guarded airport? I think not. ::)
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30864
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: KLAX In Trouble

Postby Hai Perso Coyone? » Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:13 am

yeah it think ur rite Doug 8)
it makes sense not to use heat seeking missiles near a guarded airport :)
Last edited by Hai Perso Coyone? on Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Hai Perso Coyone?
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:31 pm
Location: Rome, Italy

Re: KLAX In Trouble

Postby Woodlouse2002 » Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:20 pm

EL AL is known to have the toughest security in the world for airports they need to follow their example.

El Al and their hugh security levels basically prove to us that no matter how good security is Terrorists can still achive their aims. El Al have had Skymarshals for example since almost their creation. But they still had aircraft hijacked.

And if any terrorist is going to try and shoot down an airliner, they would most probably be using one of the Stinger missiles America sold to the taliban in the 80's. And you don't need to be close to an airport to use one of those.
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!

Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains c
User avatar
Woodlouse2002
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10369
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2002 3:51 pm
Location: Cornwall, England

Re: KLAX In Trouble

Postby Craig. » Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:25 pm

well a prime example would be, when i lived in Bristol, the fields i used to go running in, were right under the flight path for the airport the planes would be 15 miles out but at barely 2000 feet. The area was largely away from anywhere and a person could take out a plane with a missile and escape without anyone ever seeing them.
Last edited by Craig. on Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Craig.
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 15569
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 10:04 am
Location: Birmingham

Next

Return to Real Aviation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 550 guests