Iris F-16 Vs Aerosoft F-16

General discussion about payware add-ons

Iris F-16 Vs Aerosoft F-16

Postby Rich H » Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:14 am

Last edited by Rich H on Wed Aug 26, 2009 4:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

"Politics" is made up of two words, "Poli", which is Greek for "many", and "tics", which are blood sucking insects. - Gore Vidal
User avatar
Rich H
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2017
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:40 am
Location: Solihull, U.K.

Re: Iris F-16 Vs Aerosoft F-16

Postby Mobius » Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:23 pm

Aerosoft definitely has a much better looking VC than the IRIS one, but I only have the Aerosoft one so I'm only looking at the screenshots.  The Aerosoft one can be rather system intesive as well, but I really enjoy it. 

Here's a few images of the VC I took a few months ago: http://205.252.250.26/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaB ... 1224819496
Image
User avatar
Mobius
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3653
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 10:44 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Re: Iris F-16 Vs Aerosoft F-16

Postby Bullseyee » Fri Aug 28, 2009 6:26 am

God I love the Aerosoft one ! On another PC : I bought it and even with all settings to none, I can't get above 20fps :(
But if you have a high-end PC, I think both are fantastic, because if I'm not mistaking, you can drop things in the IRIS one..

E-
Image
User avatar
Bullseyee
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 98
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:41 am
Location: Antwerp

Re: Iris F-16 Vs Aerosoft F-16

Postby Rich H » Fri Aug 28, 2009 6:46 am

According to Iris, their F-16 is very easy on frames, more so than their F-14.
Image

"Politics" is made up of two words, "Poli", which is Greek for "many", and "tics", which are blood sucking insects. - Gore Vidal
User avatar
Rich H
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2017
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:40 am
Location: Solihull, U.K.

Re: Iris F-16 Vs Aerosoft F-16

Postby EJW » Fri Aug 28, 2009 7:56 am

According to Iris, their F-16 is very easy on frames, more so than their F-14.


True, the Iris F-16 is very smooth and is equally as much fun to fly as the Aerosoft version. However, the Aerosoft version is higher quality.
EJW
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2760
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 7:06 am
Location: Lincolnshire, UK

Re: Iris F-16 Vs Aerosoft F-16

Postby BigTruck » Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:20 am

I have a medium level PC and I fly the Aerosoft... if I reduce water effects to 1x high and put a few other settings towards the center she flies very smooth, and she's a blast to fly, you can get her up to around 80,000 feet up with a good dive and pull back at full burner (prepare to run out of fuel and make sure you can do a stall recovery/glide to nearest airport) and if you just want to cruise it has plenty of knobs and switches to play with, some good sounds, nice exterior, and crisp handling. 

I haven't flown the Iris so I can't judge it yet :)
Alienware X51_R2 (thank you wife) Windows 8.1, 6GB Ram, Intel Core i3-4150 CPU @3.50GHz
FSX Acceleration settings on max, no twitches or glitches.
Saitek X52 Stick and Throttle
User avatar
BigTruck
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 7048
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:35 pm
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL

Re: Iris F-16 Vs Aerosoft F-16

Postby go-go-godzilla.com » Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:23 pm

If you want a complete review of the Aerosoft vs. IRIS F-16 I just posted one on my review and workflow website:

http://www.go-go-godzilla.com/fsx_f-16_fly-off.html

I've also included a comparison sound sample from both jets but right now those files aren't working in EI7 or 8 and will hopefully get fixed soon.

Cheers.
go-go-godzilla.com
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 9:15 pm

Re: Iris F-16 Vs Aerosoft F-16

Postby pfevrier » Tue Dec 22, 2009 11:40 pm

I have the IRIS F16, and I regret not having picked up Aerosoft's F16. Aerosoft might be a little intimidating with the many different systems, knobs and buttons but in the end seems more gratifying.
IRIS's F16 looked good, but I think now a little too shiny. Aerosoft's bird looks more weathered and realistic. IRIS' jet is too simple. I guess it's good for people that want to fly right out of the box, but I got bored with it so quickly... Definitely not my best buy  :'(
-Pierre-
pfevrier
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1669
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 1:47 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Iris F-16 Vs Aerosoft F-16

Postby go-go-godzilla.com » Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:00 am

[quote]I have the IRIS F16, and I regret not having picked up Aerosoft's F16. Aerosoft might be a little intimidating with the many different systems, knobs and buttons but in the end seems more gratifying.
IRIS's F16 looked good, but I think now a little too shiny. Aerosoft's bird looks more weathered and realistic. IRIS' jet is too simple. I guess it's good for people that want to fly right out of the box, but I got bored with it so quickly... Definitely not my best buy
go-go-godzilla.com
Ground hog
Ground hog
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 9:15 pm

Re: Iris F-16 Vs Aerosoft F-16

Postby Slotback » Thu Dec 24, 2009 8:07 am

Falcon 4.0 Allied Force.
Slotback
 


Return to Payware

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 281 guests