by MICROSOFT » Thu Aug 07, 2003 12:07 pm
Well, the GPS in FS2002 is pretty basic, but it achieves what it is supposed to, and that is to provide sufficient aid to navigation.
In Fs2004, the garmin GPS is superbly advanced. One thing I like about garmin is the terrain mode. The use of garmin is a little complicated, but the documentation and the King's video provided are of great help.
One limitation of Fs2002 is that there is a lack of information regarding various topics, and one such is the GPS along with the radio.
I would say that the documentation style and content of FS2004 along with the simplicity of FS2002 combined would have made a very good product. Alone, FS2002 lacks sufficient good and detailed documentaion of several topics , and FS2004 alone lacks 'new features'. FS2004 can be considered as an upgrade package rather than a unique one.
I don't represent M$. Then why the name M$? Simple...I like what they make, especially FS!