Textures vs. Full aircraft add-ons

Flight Simulator 2002. Questions, suggestions, problems or solutions... aim here!

Textures vs. Full aircraft add-ons

Postby FLAPS_DOWN » Fri Mar 28, 2003 10:38 am

Thanks once again for all the good info.  I am sure that this question has been raised before, but I didn't have time to go back too far, I have noticed that in adding new aircraft some are textures, some are full packages.  Obviously for those aircraft that are not defaults in FS02 I have added, but for those that are included is there any advantage to adding the full aircraft, does that bog down your system if all I am looking for is the various airline livery addition to the sim experience?  So veteran advice would be greatly appreciated!
User avatar
FLAPS_DOWN
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 10:41 am
Location: Utah

Re: Textures vs. Full aircraft add-ons

Postby DeepSpace » Fri Mar 28, 2003 10:44 am

Hi.
i don't see it necessary to install a full aircraft that's default. i think that the default aircrafts r pretty good.
DeepSpace
1st Lieutenant
1st Lieutenant
 
Posts: 428
Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2002 11:55 am
Location: Israel

Re: Textures vs. Full aircraft add-ons

Postby codered » Fri Mar 28, 2003 10:54 am

What ever default aircraft you have it is best to leave them in your aircraft folder.  You can add more textures to them, just like you can add more textures to addon aircraft that have the same mapping.  Adding textures is better than adding another entire aircraft from a hard drive usage point of view.  Remember the more aircraft you add, and this includes ones that are just more liveries, it will take longer for FS2002 to start up.  When you go to select an aircraft you will notice a bit of a lag because it has to load all of the possibilities up.  Atleast this is how it appears to me.  If you have just the default aircraft everything boots up real quick.  But the more you add the longer it will take.  Granted it isn't an extreme amount, but you will notice it.  Best thing, use textures whenever you can, and avoid duplicating aircraft folders.
Windows XP SP1
Motherboard: Epox 8RDA + main board
Processor: AMD XP2500 Barton CPU
Memory: PC2700 1gb Geil DDR
Hard Drive: SEA HDD IDE 40GB 7M 40GPP
Hard Drive: Western Digital 40gb 8mb cache
Monitor 15 LCD Flat Panel Displa
codered
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1620
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 1:09 am

Re: Textures vs. Full aircraft add-ons

Postby FLAPS_DOWN » Fri Mar 28, 2003 12:30 pm

Thanks, I guess I am trying to put together the most realistic environment without unnecessarily using up tonsof hd space and slowing the system down.  I would be interested in knowing what suggestions anyone would have on a good well rounded 'realistic' major airport fleet.  i.e., # of different models or types.  Also, for instance if I am going to add an aircraft like say a B767, what would be a good base model to use and then add textures to?  Any others like say a B727, airbus etc.  Thanks.  
User avatar
FLAPS_DOWN
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 10:41 am
Location: Utah


Return to FS 2002

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 506 guests