Mythbusters

Discuss Movies, Music, TV, etc here.

Re: Mythbusters

Postby ShaneG_old » Mon Jun 15, 2009 4:44 pm

But it did break. ;)
Last edited by ShaneG_old on Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ShaneG_old
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 9700
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:52 am

Re: Mythbusters

Postby Travis » Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:58 pm

[quote]But it did break. ;)
Last edited by ShaneG_old on Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Travis
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4381
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 3:17 am
Location: KAUS - 30 MI NW

Re: Mythbusters

Postby ShaneG_old » Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:03 pm

[quote][quote]But it did break. ;)
ShaneG_old
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 9700
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:52 am

Re: Mythbusters

Postby Hagar » Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:12 pm

I haven't been able to see the episode, but I'm wondering when in it they said that a sonic boom couldn't break glass?

http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/mythbus ... speed.html

:-?


The myth was that any sonic boom will break any glass.

That was the only window they were able to break.


edited for so many typos... ::)


Yes, thanks. I was about to say that. That means planes, bullets, anything going supersonic. It didn't work. They had tables full of all kinds of glass stuff set up, a car, and a small "house" set up. That one pane of glass is the only thing that they were able to break.

8-)

I haven't watched the video but I suspect Matt is correct. It all depends on the type of glass & how it's framed. Most of the complaints around here in the 50s & 60s were from smallholders & market gardeners with greenhouses. These were large areas of low grade glass loosely mounted in wooden frames. The vibration from a sonic boom caused by an aircraft would have a good chance of breaking at least some of the panes. I don't know for certain but I imagine even the greenhouse glass manufactured today is superior to what was used 60 years ago.
Last edited by Hagar on Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30864
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: Mythbusters

Postby Travis » Tue Jun 16, 2009 1:09 am

[quote][quote][quote]But it did break. ;)
Image
User avatar
Travis
Major
Major
 
Posts: 4381
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 3:17 am
Location: KAUS - 30 MI NW

Re: Mythbusters

Postby ShaneG_old » Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:14 am

[quote][quote][quote][quote]But it did break. ;)
ShaneG_old
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 9700
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:52 am

Re: Mythbusters

Postby krigl » Thu Jul 16, 2009 8:27 am

A lot of the results of Mythbusters' 'research' are completely flawed because they focus on issues from just one angle - because it's all for fun of course...

For example, the 'running or walking in the rain' episode concluded it's better to walk because you get more wet if you run (if my memory serves). But they didn't mention that if you run you get indoors and out of the cold + wet quicker... :)

Having said that, it's one of the most entertaining programmes I know... my favourite was when they blew up the cement mixer  ;D
If you're bored of an evening - and you'll have to be - you can check out my screenshot gallery: Kriglsflightsimscreens...HERE

[center][img]http://www.simviation.com/phpup
krigl
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8234
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:47 am

Previous

Return to Music, Arts & Entertainment

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 483 guests