Solos

[Tequila Sunrise]

Everlasting argument between me and the singer in a band thats been on and off for the last three years, so is it Slash infront of the church or Kurt's melody line "solo"?

Craig

[Sock]

The only time I mind long solos is when they go on for upwards of 20 minutes at concerts!  You want to do a little 10 minutes didly, fine, just keep it interesting.  But don't drag it out that long.  As for solos in songs, I'd say 5 minutes is max for me.

[Woodlouse2002]

Both enjoyable and showoffish.

[Souichiro]

Depends on who is doing it but mostly I like!! also like drum solo's

[BMan1113VR]

it depends on the setting and the attitude/talent of the guitarist

[Paz]

 Solos can be a very important part of a song if they are structured properly, it takes a very talented guitarist to keep twenty minutes of weedle-doo's and wee-wee's interesting, Frank Zappa was pretty good at this, he could improvise a twenty minute solo and make it sound like a song in itself.

[|| Andy ||]

1min max,
otherwise it recks the tune of the song..

IMO, the best songs always have a short solo.. example: Rammstein - Du Riechst So Gut  (imo  ::))

[JackieAdkins]

i enjoi guitar solos as long as they sound good and the person dosent suck at playing.

Kerry King from Slayer, yeah he F'in sucks, i hate that guy, and i hate slayer. Rain in Blood is the only songs that i somewhat like up until the point where King comes in with his crappy solos, he is a tool bag and if he never makes music again i will be a happy person.

[Paz]

 Slayer Rulez!!!

[JackieAdkins]

hahahahahaha, no they dont but, someone has to like them, hahaha

[Anti-Societys Snake]

SLAYER RULES!!!
and you can go to hell


~Snake

the only reason I flamed was due to his digging so deep in his insult.

[Jared]

lol, It depends on the person and the type of solo, some people can pull it off, others such as myself cannot..