did anyone saw something weird near Orion constelation last night?

[alrot]

it may have been a satellite in geo-sync orbit making a position adjustment. (You may have seen it's reflection)

It shined too much for being moved

[Bud Greene]

Whatever is is...

..the truth is out there!... ...!

Quote:
"Seen in Nevada and Calarada"
End Quote.

Paul.... 8-)...!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_X-Files

Thank you Agent Mulder.

[Club508]

it may have been a satellite in geo-sync orbit making a position adjustment. (You may have seen it's reflection)

It shined too much for being moved

[jetprop]

well:
i had a few weird things in the sky,but those where most likely meteors(seen about 5 in my life ,nearly ALWAYS cloudy)and one of them i don't know what it was,looked like it was at realy high altitude and it was moving slowly,don't know what it was,maybe a satelite.

but was it a line or a dot?
i don't have a clue what it was either but this may help others.

[alrot]

[quote]
NOW HOOOLD ON THERE BUSTER!!!
NOT TRUE on the flames.
Now please take the time to read my rant, even if you don't read my theory.
On most common flames, it is commonly mistaken, and I've done my research, both inside the classroom and out.

[Club508]

[quote]Light/ Flames ? I don't understand what would be the diference? both came from the same thing "Heat" one uses the air become flames and the other can't because is in and empty space
You are wrong about the temperatures longitude waves of light



http://docs.kde.org/stable/en/kdeedu/ks ... dtemp.html
I'm going to give you a practical way to understand this
http://es.dreamstime.com/antorcha-del-a ... 520401.jpg
the white part and the blue ones are hotter than the read and orange ,we use the blue/white part of the torch to cut or weld
it wasn't a black hole or in what you mean is a gamma burst which would be the only thing that last 4 minutes Common and less powerless supernova last a little bit longer , other wise we all by now would be in all news all over the world ,besides they don't move horizontally ..

[Club508]

Alright.  I went in my image editor and attempted to create something that would look close to what my theory would look like.  I don't know how close it is, and just add the part where it shifts wherever you want.

[alrot]

Club you can't change decades scientific results , on the contrary Red Giants star are colder that Blue stars,..
like Antares (a dying red) and Sirius (Blue) massive violent and die fast

[Club508]

[quote]Club you can't change decades scientific results , on the contrary Red Giants star are colder that Blue stars,..
like Antares (a dying red) and Sirius (Blue) massive violent and die fast

[jetprop]

1.  I think the space station isn't in total vacuum,its in the thinnest part of athmosphere i think...

2. Dark matter and the wave IS the vibration(?)

3. I don't have a clue.

4. Why doesn't it happen to aircraft?

5. Light is energy,and heat is a form of energy,the spectrums are just the different kinds of energy.

these are all my oppinions...

[alrot]

[quote]
This just so goes against what I was taught in science class last year.

Agggh!

[Club508]

I'd probably close to blow the character limit of the forum if I quoted you, so I'll skip that and save everyone some scrolling.

But thanks!  6 times over!  (You look good in the picture by the way)
And really, an AMATEUR?!?!?  You seem pretty knowledgeable to me.
This world's going mad.


And a thing of heat being the vibration of particles etc., if that is correct, how can objects cool down?  Once they start hitting each other, they'll start heating up more, causing them to hit each other more and at higher speed, generating even more heat, until the atoms were finally going at or past he speed of light, and unable to slow down!

Though I am developing a slight theory on heat over here myself, and I have been for a while.

Alright, now here's the deal.  I actually go on creating many theories, many of them I don't quite know or understand myself.  I often keep them extremely private, but I'm going to let this heat one slip.  Just if this one actually somehow turns out correct, please don't go taking my credit.

Heat Theory #01
What if heat actually exists not within the vibrations or the atoms and items themselves, but actually in the empty vaccum BETWEEN them?  More specifically, what if heat is a wave, that can only exist in a vaccum?  Even more specifically, what if heat is CREATED by the collision of things like atoms and their parts, but EXISTS as a wave that can only exist in a vaccum?  Even MORE specifically, when the wave hits any particle, it is destroyed completely or weakened wherever the contact was made.

It could also help define the heat generated by friction.  Even when two objects are (seemingly) right against each other, there's always that tiny bit of vaccum, even if it's smaller than a quark.
The atoms of the object will clash, creating the heat.  The heat will exist in the vaccum between the objects and in the space between the object's atom's parts.

It would explain why warm air essentially "rises".  It doesn't.  Due to gravity, the particles in the air are pulled twoard the earth, making for less pressure at higher altitude, meaning more space between particles, meaning more room for heat to exist.  It also means there will be less atom collisions, meaning there will be less generation of heat, causing why the tops of mountains are usually colder.

It would explain why the tips of flames always attempt to go upwards.  The heat exists above where there is more vaccum.

It woukld explain why objects can cool down.
The heat is cut off by interfereing particles.

This is all I can remember about my theory without going back through and digging it back up.
I hope you enjoyed my rant!  by the way, please let me know if you can find any problems with my theory and I'll try to bat them out to fix my theory.

[expat]

Slightly off topic, but NASA has just put a new satellite in orbit around the moon. Will it be possible to view it with a small telescope (the satellite that is, not the moon.......Just though I would preempt the usual SimV jokers )

Matt

[jetprop]

club: hhmmm,thats actutaly a decent theory,haven't read through properly but it seems good.
but the main problem is:theories,will always stay theories.

[Fozzer]

Slightly off topic, but NASA has just put a new satellite in orbit around the moon. Will it be possible to view it with a small telescope (the satellite that is, not the moon.......Just though I would pre-empt the usual SimV jokers )

Matt

Lots of Comets, Asteroids, exploding Nebula's, and collapsing Stars in the sky last night!... [smiley=2vrolijk_08.gif]...!

My nest-door neighbour suggested it may be something to do with Fireworks, and New Year's celebrations?... :-/...!

Paul...Sim V Joker... ... ...!