Flying around the world.

[FlierForLife]

For some time now I have been pondering an around the world flight in FSX. I want to fly a small aircraft in the size range between the Cessna 182 and the Beechcraft King Air. I have also been thinking about using a very small business jet, but I still have to find a good add on. I don't want to push buttons all day in the 747 or the like, I actually want to see the world, however simulated it may be! I just want an opinion on a few things from you. First of all, should it be a small jet, turboprop, or a good old fashioned piston? Should the flight go to all continents or just strait around the globe? Finally, should I doo this at all or does it sound like a bust? Please post you opinion because it really matters to me!  -Taylor

[BFMF]

The last flight around the world I did in FSX was with the Spartan Executive.

Also, I never used the accelerated time function, unlimited fuel option, or GPS & map to determine my location. Use real world weather to make it more interesting.

I still even have my route on a map in my signature

[BigTruck]

I did a tour de world in the Aerosoft Piper Cheyenne and it was terrific.  A turbo prop so she went fast enough, yet not a jet so it wasn't too high and boring.  We struggled to get from Asia to America, landing on a strip somewhere between Russia and Alaska for fuel, it was scary after 2 weeks of flying with no crashes, I ddin't want to ruin the record. 

Real world weather and fuel calculations made it a bit nerve racking if I flew into a storm where I was supposed to land with 10% fuel remaining and the next nearest airport was 100 miles away. 

I would suggest using a turbo prop.

[Ang2dogs]

All I can say is go for it!  I did a across the USA in a jenny west coast to east coast, I've been planning around the world flight in the DC3. I guess it's the ultimite quest that we all must do to be true sim pilots !

[BigTruck]

[quote]All I can say is go for it!

[Skunkworks]

Aerosoft's (Digital Aviation) Piper Cheyenne. High ceiling turbo prop reverse thrusting dream plane with just enough challenge not to be boring...

[FlierForLife]

OK, I will do it. I still have to find a flight plan for it though. Help would be greatly appriciated!

[Steve M]

I think the land masses are closer connected between the 60th and 70th paralells for a prop flight. BFMF's route would be longer, but likely more scenic. (Just my two cents)

[Skunkworks]

OK, I will do it. I still have to find a flight plan for it though. Help would be greatly appriciated!

Maybe use this picture with Google earth to plot your flight plan.
My sincere apologies to the original poster as I've forgotten your handle.

[TacitBlue]

When I do these kind of long flights, I like to plan just a few legs at a time rather than the whole trip at once. I find that it allows you to keep it interesting. For example, if you get into an area with boring scenery, you aren't stuck with it. You can make the next leg of the trip take you somewhere more interesting.

I've never gone around the world, but I've done a few US coast to coast trips, and one in Canada. Also followed the coast of Africa all the way around from Cairo back to Cairo. That one was pretty cool.

[Nav]

Oddly enough, FlierForLife, I can honestly say that that's what I do all the time. Westbound and eastbound, and using 'real weather' so that no two trips are ever the same.

Two things are 'paramount,' to my mind.

Firstly, it's important to consider the effects of "Great Circle' routes. FS9 won't 'plot' an RW route for you, it has to be done in two halves - but, above all, don't plan your route on the basis of the 'Mercator Projection.' Flying RW Melbourne/Melbourne, for example, the Great Circle Route takes me over Canada......

So plot a course a bit under halfway (I tend to use Melbourne/St. Johns, Newfoundland) to start with) and go on from there. Maybe plot the second leg from say Heathrow?

Secondly, I think a range of at least 1,500nms. is required. On any kind of RW trip there are some flights that shouldn't be missed (my own personal all-time favourite being San Francisco-Honolulu). That's the best part of 2,000nms., but you can manage it in the Cessna if need be, by leaning the mixture and keeping the power down.....

[fourbee]

was about to suggest the spartan but someone got there before me! Just have fun and experiment with fuel range with the mixture and you'll be surprised how far you'll get!
good luck!

[RaptorF22]

I have been thinking about doing this for a while now, might do it this summer.
I don't really want to fly around the world with my current all-default scenery; what would be a good add-on to make the whole globe more interesting?
Also, I kind of think it might be more fun to switch up aircraft a few times throughout the route, rather than taking the same plane all the way around. Just a thought.

[FlierForLife]

I have been thinking about doing this for a while now, might do it this summer.
I don't really want to fly around the world with my current all-default scenery; what would be a good add-on to make the whole globe more interesting?
Also, I kind of think it might be more fun to switch up aircraft a few times throughout the route, rather than taking the same plane all the way around. Just a thought.

You could get Real Environment Xtreme (REX). It changes the defult textures. PM me and I'l tell you how to get it for free, like I did... 

[FlierForLife]

I think I have my plan. I could use the Beechcraft Baron, meaning I would get a good cruise speed, build some twin time (ok, a lot of twin time), and I would have a simple auto pilot for really long flights. I will use the route on this website:  http://www.dmcity.com/slarty/route.html   . It gives a real round the world flight, touring each continent instead of flying strait through it. Do you guys think this is a good plan, or how could it be better?