I used to make bows from birch limbs or climbing a young birch tree until it bent down, then cut off its top; most of my bowstrings were baling twine. When my dad was gone I made square shafts on the table saw (I was @ 10) and fletched them with chicken feathers -- once with aluminum (which flew well after cutting above my thumb on the pass) -- and painted them with Pactra or Testor's model paint. My best one (and my only such accomplishment), however, I whittled from an exceptionally straight branch; I lost it on a range shot, whereupon, it flew many yards beyond my expectation into the woods.LOL, when I was a kid I used to just use whatever arrows my parents or other family gave me, none of them matched and I shot quite well. So maybe the other things aren't as important as length.
A fellow of French descent (many Canadian French about; some of my cousins are) that some of my ancestry's archers had beaten back the much more numerous French. He thought I was speaking of my Native American ancestry but I meant the English longbowmen at Agincourt. The longbow outreached the crossbow on that field; the Genoese crossbowmen wound up shooting their allied French knights in the back in an attempt to match them.I've often thought of making a bow, or a medieval-style crossbow.
Not entirely, but it's more like an alternative-powered gun. At closer range, it was more effective than a bow.I don't consider crossbow shooting to be archery, as it is an entirely different skill.
Not quite belt fed; a lever unit made the crossbow version "somewhat" more like a bolt-action rifle but respectively even more clumsy because the loading procedure was rather 'delicate' (most archers trained for rapid-shot with a bow were more effective).Untill they make a belt fed bow, i'm not interested....
Untill they make a belt fed bow, i'm not interested....
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 697 guests