Plane on conveyor belt

If it doesn't fit .. It fits here .. - -

Re: Plane on conveyor belt

Postby BAW0343 » Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:01 am

I have a feeling nobody is really understanding anyone here
Last edited by BAW0343 on Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image Image
User avatar
BAW0343
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3011
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 4:26 am
Location: Mesa, AZ

Re: Plane on conveyor belt

Postby Jeff.Guo » Mon Jan 25, 2010 11:37 am

[quote]I don't disagree, the aircraft can accelerate and takeoff regardless of what the conveyor belt is doing.
Jeff.Guo
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 273
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 9:30 pm

Re: Plane on conveyor belt

Postby ApplePie » Mon Jan 25, 2010 1:32 pm

I don't know about you people, but I find this thread hilarious. ;D
Last edited by ApplePie on Mon Jan 25, 2010 1:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[center][url=http://www.mysimshots.net/photosearch.php?icao=&id=&airport=&aircraft=&country=&airline=&photographer=ApplePie&flightsim=&viewtype=&remarks=&page=&date=&order=views+desc][img]http://www.simviati
User avatar
ApplePie
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2047
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 1:42 pm
Location: North Carolina, USA

Re: Plane on conveyor belt

Postby beaky » Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:33 pm

[quote] So its groundspeed (on the conveyor belt) is takeoff speed, HOWEVER its actual motion, and airspeed, is zero.
Image
User avatar
beaky
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 8:00 am
Location: Shenandoah, PA USA

Re: Plane on conveyor belt

Postby DaveSims » Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:37 pm

The myth, at least in my interpretation, isn't whether or not the aircraft will have enough thrust to overcome the motion of the conveyor belt.
Last edited by DaveSims on Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
DaveSims
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2350
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 2:59 am
Location: Clear Lake, Iowa

Re: Plane on conveyor belt

Postby beaky » Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:54 pm

[quote][quote]I don't disagree, the aircraft can accelerate and takeoff regardless of what the conveyor belt is doing.
Last edited by beaky on Mon Jan 25, 2010 3:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
beaky
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 12877
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 8:00 am
Location: Shenandoah, PA USA

Re: Plane on conveyor belt

Postby Jeff.Guo » Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:52 pm

Leave static friction out of it, that little bit seems to lie beyond what we can comprehend here.

The takeoff roll distance will be virtually the same. If it was a high school level physics class, there'd a note saying "ignore friction"...
Last edited by Jeff.Guo on Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Jeff.Guo
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 273
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 9:30 pm

Re: Plane on conveyor belt

Postby TacitBlue » Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:01 am

I don't know about you people, but I find this thread hilarious. ;D


I do as well, that's why I've given up on trying to contribute. ;D
Image
A&P Mechanic, Rankin Aircraft 78Y

Aircraft are naturally beautiful because form follows function. -TB
User avatar
TacitBlue
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3856
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 12:33 pm
Location: Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA

Re: Plane on conveyor belt

Postby OVERLORD_CHRIS » Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:32 pm

Thrust is thrust. With a single engine aircraft, there is no sucking of air toward or over the wings, the slipstream is all along the fuselage. Also, even with a "crop duster" as you so eloquently put it, you do need a certain amount of thrust just to get moving, considerably less than you need to keep moving. If you try taxiing a real (non FS) airplane, you'll understand.
You miss what I said about the C-130 witch does draw air over the wing, because the pitch of the blades change and bite more at the air. And given the relation of where the engines are on the wings, and most large prop planes for that matter, the air being pulled by the blades ends up going over and under the wings, helping with lift.

As far as thrust, I am seeing it from my everyday point of view dealing with wide bodies and heavies on daily basis, such as: An-124's, C-5's, 747-200/400's, C-17's, C-130's, and KC-135's. And since almost all of them taxi out near maxed out on weight, it takes almost 50% or more thrust just to get out of the chocks(usually not much more). But once moving they retard the throttles down to the bear min to keep up momentum, until they reach the hold line near the runway were they have to come to a complete stop again before they get clearance. But if they are lucking they can get take off clearance while rolling and not have to stop. 




[quote]I have a feeling nobody is really understanding anyone here
Image
User avatar
OVERLORD_CHRIS
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1136
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:56 am
Location: Chalreston SC

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 596 guests