thats quit a list rotty
mines pretty short....
C172S
C172P
thats quit a list rotty
mines pretty short....
C172S
C172P
I might ad a N or Q model this saturday, thats my next day I get to fly and I get to do stalls :)
My greater concern, as alrot points out, is that there's no "all of the above" option! >:(
Okay, ya'll smart guys: which option should I delete to insert this hypothetical "All of the Above" option?
Oh, and just so ya know, I'm starting flight school come the 25th! Gonna fly a C152, Diamonds and a couple of others. And I'll be flying out of the same airport Bush Jr uses to get to Crawford, TX. He's going there soon: I may get pics of AF1 landing!
I remember having a discussion similar to this in the FS9 forum and most of the people posting only liked big jets. A few of them actually said that MS shouldn't have included the Cessna and the Cub because "that isn't real flying anyway".
That's Heresy....! >:(
A few of them actually said that MS shouldn't have included the Cessna and the Cub because "that isn't real flying anyway".
...and how is a pleasure cruise with an assitant crew and copilot flying?That's Heresy....!I remember having a discussion similar to this in the FS9 forum and most of the people posting only liked big jets. A few of them actually said that MS shouldn't have included the Cessna and the Cub because "that isn't real flying anyway".
I find it ineresting that there are twice as many votes for "single engine prop" (or however it's worded) than there are for multi jets. I remember having a discussion similar to this in the FS9 forum and most of the people posting only liked big jets. A few of them actually said that MS shouldn't have included the Cessna and the Cub because "that isn't real flying anyway". I always found that irritating.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 763 guests