The future of Coltishall

If it doesn't fit .. It fits here .. - -

The future of Coltishall

Postby Anark » Thu Nov 23, 2006 4:19 pm

Is apparantly going to be turned into an "Immigration Detention and Removal Center" according to the BBC.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/norfolk/6172872.stm
What a shame but I suppose we need a place to dump 'em all ;D
Image

Intel Core2 Quad @2.40GHz, Vista Ultimate, NVIDIA 8500GT, 500GB internal HDD and 250GB external.

[center]My [url=http://www.myaviation.net/sear
User avatar
Anark
Captain
Captain
 
Posts: 986
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 8:12 am
Location: Yorkshire

Re: The future of Coltishall

Postby MWISimmer » Thu Nov 23, 2006 5:01 pm

My parents live about 3 miles from Coltishall, and the list has been changing since they announced decomissioning. So far:
Retail park
Business park
Prison
Housing estate
Immigration centre
There was even a rumour Norwich Airport may relocate there.
Rob.
MWISimmer
 

Re: The future of Coltishall

Postby C » Thu Nov 23, 2006 5:03 pm

What a surprise...

...not. Just about the same for any disused airfield - either an immigration centre (deportation might be easier if they reopen the runway - our government has an inability to arrange such simple things alas). Either that or it'll be come a prison...

...and that is how our government (Education, education, education, remember) care to treat our history. :-/

I didn't vote for 'em.
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: The future of Coltishall

Postby F3Hadlow » Thu Nov 23, 2006 7:54 pm

Pathetic, this country is so over-run thanks to it's ridiculously lenient system that we're turning historic sites (yes, despite the goverments best efforts to make us forget the fact, we WERE once a powerful and proud country) into places to sort out their mess. >:( :-[

Reminds me of a local station to me, RAF Acklington, a major Spitfire base up here in the north during the BoB, what is it now you ask? it's the site of a prison, Charlie is spot on. :(
F3Hadlow
 

Re: The future of Coltishall

Postby expat » Fri Nov 24, 2006 3:25 am

Is apparantly going to be turned into an "Immigration Detention and Removal Center" according to the BBC.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/norfolk/6172872.stm
What a shame but I suppose we need a place to dump 'em all ;D


An immigration detention center maybe, but removal..........In the words of Nelson, Ha, Ha.

Matt
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....

Re: The future of Coltishall

Postby flymo » Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:20 am

only an all too familiar story in this country and you are all spot on their about with your opinions and mine are very similar. bring back maggie :P ;D

john
flymo
 

Re: The future of Coltishall

Postby C » Fri Nov 24, 2006 10:33 am

Reminds me of a local station to me, RAF Acklington, a major Spitfire base up here in the north during the BoB, what is it now you ask? it's the site of a prison, Charlie is spot on. :(


Generally the technical sites become the prison/immigration centre/waste of space/barracks, whilst the airfield site (grass and runways) becomes some thing else, be it farming, housing, an Army (god forbid) base. In Acklington's case I believe its been an open cast mine for many years...
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: The future of Coltishall

Postby expat » Fri Nov 24, 2006 11:54 am

an Army (god forbid) base.



It is coming Charlie, just wait and see. Look at the Navy and RAF Harriers. The Helicopter force is Blue, but directed by Green.
I am still in contact with a few people from my previous life. I hear that the combined Harrier force is not the happiest of places. Fish Heads that are missing the sea and Crabs that can't get far enough away from a boat and bell bottoms. With so much under manning it is just a matter of time, but look on the bright side. All that money saved on three uniforms could be diverted to buy ammo that goes bang properly. Then you can all were green and a baseball cap instead :-/

Matt
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....

Re: The future of Coltishall

Postby C » Fri Nov 24, 2006 1:31 pm

I am still in contact with a few people from my previous life. I hear that the combined Harrier force is not the happiest of places. Fish Heads that are missing the sea and Crabs that can't get far enough away from a boat and bell bottoms.



No it isn't. Amusingly I read this week that the newly formed 801NAS won't actually have it's own unit until late next year (they've moved in with 800 apparently). At least then they'll have two RN GR7/9 Sqns to put on the ships - and a smaller proportion of RAF guys will have to go to sea (cos if they wanted to do that they would have joined the navy!).

JHC is the same apparently too.

All I can say is thankfully the Army and Navy (not House of Fraser!) don't have their own transport aircraft!

My point about the Army though was aimed in another direction, thinking in particular about Leconfield, Catterick, Waterbeach et al, which have all had perfectly good runways decimated by the Army. Catterick's is most ridiculous - it is now a car park!
User avatar
C
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 11977
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 1:04 pm
Location: Earth

Re: The future of Coltishall

Postby expat » Fri Nov 24, 2006 2:49 pm

My point about the Army though was aimed in another direction, thinking in particular about Leconfield, Catterick, Waterbeach et al, which have all had perfectly good runways decimated by the Army. Catterick's is most ridiculous - it is now a car park!


The Army applied to build on the runway of my local ex-RAF base. Fortunately the town authorities said no. They also said that the "no" will last a minimum of 20 years before it can be asked again.

Matt
"A bit of a pickle" - British translation: A catastrophically bad situation with potentially fatal consequences.

PETA Image People Eating Tasty Animals.

B1 (Cat C) licenced engineer, Boeing 737NG 600/700/800/900 Airbus A318/19/20/21 and Dash8 Q-400
1. Captain, if the problem is not entered into the technical logbook.........then the aircraft does not have a problem.
2. And, if you have time to write the fault on a napkin and attach to it to the yoke.........you have time to write it in the tech log....see point 1.
User avatar
expat
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 8679
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Deep behind enemy lines....


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 443 guests