by H » Fri Sep 30, 2005 3:02 am
I certainly wasn't expecting this to be a, somewhat, current political thread although we must accept that much that has been ventured in the recent human past has had political involvement. I've just surrendered my past year's vice presidency (because somebody finally offered to take the position -- yaaay!!) on a small community Board; I've been involved with the expungement of tax funded money so what I'm stating is from personal knowledge without any names mentioned.
Direct commercial involvement rarely comes without a combination of financial means and projected financial gain. Going to a local ship merchant with this "unfeasable" scheme of a sea route over the edge of the world (the foremost outlook was that you fell off -- those who had near proper concepts of gravity were, originally, scientific heretics), Columbus would be pointed down the land route [road], instead. But, again, when politicians put a venture into play, what happens? Commercial avenues see their projected financial gain and off they go to receive as much of it as they can -- and many are very good at making charges legally viable.
There usually are apparent dangers in any progressive venture. Many of our technological advances have been made in or for wars in which many people died: the winds of war blow hot and cold. That they do so in any other scenario can be quite possible, if not probable -- but not so savagely, to so many, as in a war. Not to venture at all, however, only means that your life ends, sooner or later, right where your at -- and it still may not be so painless and, often, not as quick.
Last edited by
H on Fri Sep 30, 2005 3:12 am, edited 1 time in total.