Michael was saying that he didn't believe it was wrong to have children sleeping with him (he later said he gave up the bed to whatever child was sleeping there and he took the floor!
) and that if "you are a pedophile or a monster" it would be wrong (his words!). The whole scene gave me the distinct impression that IF he did commit the crime, he wasn't aware of it.One of the reporters (later in the broadcast) was interviewing a psychologist, or something like that, who said that from what she saw in the interviews with MJ, he BELIEVED what he was saying. Now, I know there has never been any proof of his "indescretions", and that there were probably some golddiggers searching for a chunk of the money. But it does seem odd to me that it KEEPS HAPPENING. Most people who have seen or heard about the original accusations would most likely know that its foolhardy to accuse Jackson of these crimes when he has been vindicated on the same charges before.
Given, he does have a strange bit about him that would indicate his nature to molest children, but that goes along with the statement I made before: there are golddiggers, and they will exploit any foible they can to get to a person's money. But what about clergymen? They are well known for the same acts, but to date I have only heard of one priest being charged with the crimes. Why doesn't it happen more often?
So with that said, does it seem a little strange to you that, if he did do something to whatever child is badgering him this time, that he BELIEVES he is innocent. This is not my view on the facts, the interviewee (sp?) actually said those words.
The only theory I could come up with about it is that he is delusional when (and IF) he commits these crimes.
So, is Michael a modern day Jekyl and Hyde?
...!
