Battle of Britain: Failure

If it doesn't fit .. It fits here .. - -

Re: Battle of Britain: Failure

Postby Hagar » Mon Nov 24, 2003 3:04 pm

I forget where I read it. Had a quick punt round. According to this official report the drop tanks on the Spitfire Mk XIV were vulcanised fibre, wood or thin steel. http://www.fourthfightergroup.com/eagles/rb141weights.html
2.2. In addition to the above load the following alternative items may be carried:-

...........(a) 30 gallon tinned steel drop tank.
...........(b) 30 gallon vulcanized fibre drop tank.
...........(c) 30 gallon wood drop tank.
...........(d) 90 gallon tinned steel drop tank.
...........(e) 250 lb. G.P. or S.A.P. bomb.
...........(f) 500 lb. G.P., M.C. or S.A.P. bomb.


The wooden one might have been made from balsa wood & ply like the Mosquito.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30864
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

Re: Battle of Britain: Failure

Postby ATI_7500 » Mon Nov 24, 2003 3:42 pm

Hitlers biggest mistake of that period was his Sept 7th decision to stop hitting the RAF airfields and to start bombing the cities.

exactly!
The 109 was not a stable enough aircraft to mount that kind of weight on. It was also a very small plane, one of the smallest. The were dangerous enough to get off the ground and land, let alone with an extra 800 to 100 lbs on the wings (if the wings could take the weight and hardpoints!
I have seen a few pictures of 109's with drop tanks (or a drop tank under the belly), but I don't think I've ever seen one in the air.

as i said before,drop tanks were just for the later versions ("F" and up),whereas bombs could already be carried by the "E"s ("Jabos" (Jagdbombers) in Russia,quite successfull). later ,there were hard points for other weapons,like 30mm cannons ,rockets and other nice stuff.
I also read that Germany didn't have the aluminium to spare for drop tanks. In fact those that did carry them towards the end were under strict orders not to drop them unless it was a matter of life and death, because they couldn't spare the resources.

this may be true,but at the beginning of the drop-tank-era, (about '41 or '42) you could do with them what you wanted to. ;D
ATI_7500
 

Airborne Invasion

Postby Scorpiоn » Mon Nov 24, 2003 4:11 pm

Would have using the Gigant have made a difference?
The Devil's Advocate.
Image
User avatar
Scorpiоn
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3734
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 7:32 pm
Location: The Alamo

Re: Battle of Britain: Failure

Postby Professor Brensec » Mon Nov 24, 2003 4:33 pm

Excuse my ignorousness, but what is the Gigant?  ???
Image
Image
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz


I cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.
User avatar
Professor Brensec
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2002 10:40 pm
Location: SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA

Zee Glider

Postby Scorpiоn » Mon Nov 24, 2003 4:59 pm

It was a glider that was... uh... gigantic! ::) Made for carrying tanks, but I'm unsure about how well it would've performed.
The Devil's Advocate.
Image
User avatar
Scorpiоn
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3734
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 7:32 pm
Location: The Alamo

Re: Battle of Britain: Failure

Postby ATI_7500 » Tue Nov 25, 2003 6:05 am

Image
Me 321, a glider pulled by Me 110s or He 111s.
Image
Me 323, 6 engines, could fly on its own,but it was sloooooow!
Image
the front door,with light tank.

the Me 321 went into service at the end of 1941 and was the most succesful heavy transport aircraft of the war.

length: about 90ft.
wingspan: about 160 ft.
engines: 6*900HP.
it could carry up to 120 men, the record was 220 on an evacuation run from north africa.

it surely can be seen as the predecessor of modern aircraft like the starlifter or galaxy.
Last edited by ATI_7500 on Tue Nov 25, 2003 6:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
ATI_7500
 

Re: Battle of Britain: Failure

Postby Woodlouse2002 » Tue Nov 25, 2003 4:03 pm

What a target for the AA guns!!! :o
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!

Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains c
User avatar
Woodlouse2002
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10369
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2002 3:51 pm
Location: Cornwall, England

Re: Battle of Britain: Failure

Postby Professor Brensec » Tue Nov 25, 2003 4:54 pm

I knew this theme had a familiar ring to it.

I remeber now, many many years ago reading a book by Len Deighton (I think) called "SS GB" (again, I think).
The basic plot is that the Battle of Britain is lost, the Germans invade and England is occupied (hence SS and GB).

Has anyone else read it, or know of the real title and author, if I'm incorrect?  ;D ;)

(I can't really remember a terrible lot about what it was about as it must have been at least 25 years ago. I just remembered the plot from somewhere.)  ;D ;)
Image
Image
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz


I cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.
User avatar
Professor Brensec
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2002 10:40 pm
Location: SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA

Re: Battle of Britain: Failure

Postby Woodlouse2002 » Tue Nov 25, 2003 5:02 pm

[quote]I knew this theme had a familiar ring to it.

I remeber now, many many years ago reading a book by Len Deighton (I think) called "SS GB" (again, I think).
The basic plot is that the Battle of Britain is lost, the Germans invade and England is occupied (hence SS and GB).

Has anyone else read it, or know of the real title and author, if I'm incorrect?
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!

Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains c
User avatar
Woodlouse2002
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10369
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2002 3:51 pm
Location: Cornwall, England

But Would It...

Postby Scorpiоn » Tue Nov 25, 2003 5:43 pm

SS GB?  I'll look for it. ;)

Brensec, assuming Germany obtained air superiority, how could Germany have actually invaded England?
The Devil's Advocate.
Image
User avatar
Scorpiоn
Major
Major
 
Posts: 3734
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 7:32 pm
Location: The Alamo

Re: Battle of Britain: Failure

Postby Smoke2much » Tue Nov 25, 2003 5:52 pm

It's one of the darkest and most depressing books I've ever read.  I'd recommend it to anyone.

Will
Who switched the lights off?
User avatar
Smoke2much
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2755
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Sittingbourne, Kent,

Re: Battle of Britain: Failure

Postby HerSELF » Tue Nov 25, 2003 7:41 pm

[quote]It's one of the darkest and most depressing books I've ever read.
The female of the species is more deadly than the male.
User avatar
HerSELF
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 4:39 pm
Location: Norfolk, England

Re: Battle of Britain: Failure

Postby Professor Brensec » Tue Nov 25, 2003 9:26 pm

That's comforting. The fact that I was pretty much correct about the book and it's existence.

Thank you people.  ;D ;)
Image
Image
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz


I cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.
User avatar
Professor Brensec
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2002 10:40 pm
Location: SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA

Re: Battle of Britain: Failure

Postby ATI_7500 » Wed Nov 26, 2003 11:31 am

It's one of the darkest and most depressing books I've ever read.  I'd recommend it to anyone.


dark and depressing for whom? englishmen?
ATI_7500
 

Re: Battle of Britain: Failure

Postby Hagar » Wed Nov 26, 2003 12:27 pm

Silent. I have read this book but it was many years ago & I remember nothing about it. Len Deighton is one of my favourite authors & also a historian so anything he writes would be well researched & based on fact. I think you should appreciate that living in an occupied country under a harsh regime would be depressing for anyone. Nationalities don't come into it. I suggest you read the book & find out for yourself. http://www.strangewords.com/archive/SSGB.html
Last edited by Hagar on Wed Nov 26, 2003 12:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group
My Google Photos albums
My Flickr albums
User avatar
Hagar
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 30864
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2002 7:15 am
Location: Costa Geriatrica

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 586 guests