747 is nice, but try to pilot 39,000 tonnes

If it doesn't fit .. It fits here .. - -

747 is nice, but try to pilot 39,000 tonnes

Postby loomex » Tue Jul 08, 2003 7:00 am

This past weekend, I took the family on a spur of the monent trip. We drove 225 miles to Massena, NY. This is the location of the Eisenhower Lock*
It is one thing to land a 747 on a runway, but to pilot a 39,000 ton ship into a lock that is about 10 feet by 4 feet bigger that your ship is impresive. On this day he had to get the ship in with a driving rain and winds gusting up to 40kts (There was a very intense storm cell over us)
Here is the web site that was on the side of the ship,
(The  Atlantic Erie) we saw; http://www.csl.ca/

* The Eisenhower lock is on the St Lawreance Seaway. That is the route ships take to get from the Great Lakes to the Atlantic Ocean
Windows 7 Home Premium (x64) ,2.70 gigahertz AMD Phenom II X6 1045T(6-core), two HD (1TB and 500GB), 8gb RAM, ATI Radeon HD 5570,
User avatar
loomex
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1525
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2002 12:36 am
Location: Ithaca, NY

Re: 747 is nice, but try to pilot 39,000 tonnes

Postby Ivan » Tue Jul 08, 2003 7:13 am

That ship has ground-corrected GPS, bow and side screws, and a good 'Pilot' trained for that special passage.
Furhtermore, it's so big that this 40Kts wind has little influence on it in such a short distance.

The tilting caused by making corners at moderate speeds is a lot more problematic than getting it into some locks at walking speed.
Last edited by Ivan on Tue Jul 08, 2003 7:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and [url=http://an24.uw.hu/]An-24RV[/ur
Ivan
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5805
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 8:18 am
Location: The netherlands

Re: 747 is nice, but try to pilot 39,000 tonnes

Postby Rifleman » Tue Jul 08, 2003 10:55 am

Seeing your posted URL, which you recorded from the hull of that lake freighter, immediately reminded me of my youth.......my father was an inspector for the Cdn Govt and it was his job to inspect the CSL ships all around the Southern Ontario ports....also did some other testing of PFD's in Peterborough annually so we were treated as kids to view the lift-locks in operation.....quite interesting........
Image
User avatar
Rifleman
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5684
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 4:44 pm
Location: Tropical island in the Pacific

Re: 747 is nice, but try to pilot 39,000 tonnes

Postby Woodlouse2002 » Tue Jul 08, 2003 6:07 pm

Its certainly differant aint it.

The shipping pilots are amazing men and were more so earlier in the century...

Just do a search for Bristol Channel Pilot Cutters in google and you'll see...

Also search about the norweigen pilots too... They were incredible men.
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!

Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains c
User avatar
Woodlouse2002
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 10369
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2002 3:51 pm
Location: Cornwall, England

Re: 747 is nice, but try to pilot 39,000 tonnes

Postby loomex » Tue Jul 08, 2003 6:46 pm

That ship has ground-corrected GPS, bow and side screws, and a good 'Pilot' trained for that special passage.
Furhtermore, it's so big that this 40Kts wind has little influence on it in such a short distance.

The tilting caused by making corners at moderate speeds is a lot more problematic than getting it into some locks at walking speed.

Gez, you just took the whole WOW, COOL AWESOME factor out of it ;D
Actualy I know about the special systems on the ship because that was part of the tour. It was just the size of this thing that blew me away
Windows 7 Home Premium (x64) ,2.70 gigahertz AMD Phenom II X6 1045T(6-core), two HD (1TB and 500GB), 8gb RAM, ATI Radeon HD 5570,
User avatar
loomex
Major
Major
 
Posts: 1525
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2002 12:36 am
Location: Ithaca, NY

Re: 747 is nice, but try to pilot 39,000 tonnes

Postby Ivan » Wed Jul 09, 2003 2:40 am

Gez, you just took the whole WOW, COOL AWESOME factor out of it ;D

The ocean-going mammoth tankers in rotterdam are larger, and have to cope with traffic, shallows, wind, current and narrow passages. They don't want to spend money for digging out a whole channel if the boat fits in the middle with room to overtake it.
Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones),  Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and [url=http://an24.uw.hu/]An-24RV[/ur
Ivan
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 5805
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 8:18 am
Location: The netherlands

Re: 747 is nice, but try to pilot 39,000 tonnes

Postby Smoke2much » Wed Jul 09, 2003 7:25 pm

My dad was 7th Engineer on the Queen Mary and docking used to be LOADS more difficult without the modern engine control systems that they have ie direct throttle on the bridge, no engine room telegraph.

Imagine trying to reverse park a 15,000 ton car by giving verbal commands to separate people using each of the separate controls whilst you are standing on the roof.

Also whilst I agree that the various factors mentioned ie wind speed and swell will have little influence on a 39,000 ton ship moving at walking speed remember that  momentum=mass*velocity.  That great slab of a thing would stop for no-one!!!

Will
Who switched the lights off?
User avatar
Smoke2much
Major
Major
 
Posts: 2755
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Sittingbourne, Kent,


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 388 guests