by NickN » Fri Dec 14, 2007 12:37 am
That is the exaxt reason why I do not like Ultimate defrag
too many options for the layman to deal with when all that is needed are the files to placed in perfect Complete\Name order on the drive
no fancy bull of moving unused files and directories to the end
All that is needed is a Complete\Name defrag, an offline defrag, and that is it.
I prefer O&O version 8.5 over version 10 because of how it compacts the files, but, I am not screwing around with Vista right now so I have not really benchmarked the difference. O&O version 10 is compatible with Vista and will work with Vista, just like it does with XP. Many are using O&O 10 in Vista and say it works but I have not really sat down and come to any conclusions about it, mainly because I have no interest in Vista until they start getting another service pack geared up later next year.
Last edited by
NickN on Fri Dec 14, 2007 12:44 am, edited 1 time in total.